Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

170 Pages«<7778798081>»
Project Rank 5
gloryholegal
#1591 Posted : Tuesday, December 6, 2016 10:41:45 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 38

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
Thanks for all the updates guys. Starting my run to 5 with Dre's midrange shaman with a few tweaks to the mulligan file using this deck. Will post results.
midshaman MSG
1 user thanked gloryholegal for this useful post.
mary7 on 12/7/2016(UTC)
beseraf
#1596 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 2:55:55 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9

Can I make a bot configuration for the pirate war, to take the 5 rank? I would like to preset was already in the bot, but if possible, please tell me the most understandable given the fact that I do not know the English language, and Google translator distorted words. You can try to explain by means of video.

Sorry for my english. I translate using Google Translator.
He has translated into English better than Russian, it seems to me, because I understand what I copy from the Google translator, and I do not understand what I translate from English through it though.
charis2324
#1592 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 7:30:24 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 76
Location: Hong Kong

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 20 post(s)
gloryholegal;43539 wrote:
Thanks for all the updates guys. Starting my run to 5 with Dre's midrange shaman with a few tweaks to the mulligan file using this deck. Will post results.
midshaman MSG

http://pgw.udn.com.tw/gw...=0&sl=W&fw=1050
Will this aggro variation be a better one?
1 user thanked charis2324 for this useful post.
mary7 on 12/7/2016(UTC)
gloryholegal
#1593 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 12:26:48 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 38

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
Alright Here are my preliminary results for midrange jade shaman: midrangeresults

The going was slow but still above 50% from rank 18-14. Of the three most popular meta decks, it did well against dragon priest only. Renolock had the board clears required to outlast the deck and Pirate warrior was too fast for the deck. If we had more hunters, mages, and rogues on ladder, I'm confident this deck would be doing a lot better.

The bot performed well, the only glaring problem it had was against buff pally as it didn't seem to register the buffs on the cards that were buffed in hand, so it would always trade badly but still think it was killing a minion... so basically every thing that got buffed in hand would trade 2 or 3 for one. Not a major problem at this point as it isn't a very popular deck.

charis2324;43556 wrote:
http://pgw.udn.com.tw/gw/photo.php?u=http://uc.udn.com.tw/photo/2016/12/07/99/2925341.jpg&x=0&y=0&sw=0&sh=0&sl=W&fw=1050
Will this aggro variation be a better one?


I picked midrange because i had a mostly complete mulligan/combo for it that i knew performed well. I'd imagine though that if you went more aggro then your deck would perform worse against dragon priest, better against renolock, and about the same against pirate warrior.
sepefeets
#1594 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 1:39:29 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
gloryholegal;43562 wrote:
The bot performed well, the only glaring problem it had was against buff pally as it didn't seem to register the buffs on the cards that were buffed in hand, so it would always trade badly but still think it was killing a minion... so basically every thing that got buffed in hand would trade 2 or 3 for one. Not a major problem at this point as it isn't a very popular deck.

If that's true then you should post logs in the SF thread.
gloryholegal
#1595 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 2:15:36 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 38

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
sepefeets;43566 wrote:
If that's true then you should post logs in the SF thread.


Just clicked through the logs now, I guess it did record the correct values in the log, but it didn't play like it had the correct values. I'll put it up on your other thread.
adamrybicki1234
#1597 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 2:48:10 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4

Sorry for ignorance, do we need to update anything OP?
dutchpowner
#1598 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 3:08:43 PM(UTC)
dutchpowner


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 109
Location: Netherlands

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 116 time(s) in 25 post(s)
adamrybicki1234;43571 wrote:
Sorry for ignorance, do we need to update anything OP?


Yeah you have to update silverfish :)

Where can I find the changelog?
Don't forget to use the thank you button on my first post in the dutchpowner's Meta Decks for Vision AI topic :))

trazobone
#1599 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 3:28:32 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 23

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
dutchpowner;43575 wrote:
Yeah you have to update silverfish :)

Where can I find the changelog?


its usually in the SF thread but this time there wasn't any, just had support for the MSOG cards.
adamrybicki1234
#1600 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 8:05:27 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4

About to run midrange shaman (no new cards) for 20 hours with

-1 barnes, +1 Flamewreathed Faceless (swapped out because bot will play barnes before turn 6)

2 Mana tides, 1 Fire elemental, 2 lightning storm, 2 maelstrom portal, Ragnaros, no bloodlust

Starting at rank 15. Hoping for rank 10 by tomorrow.
duke44
#1601 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 8:25:46 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 133

Was thanked: 39 time(s) in 24 post(s)
adamrybicki1234;43582 wrote:
About to run midrange shaman (no new cards) for 20 hours with

-1 barnes, +1 Flamewreathed Faceless (swapped out because bot will play barnes before turn 6)

2 Mana tides, 1 Fire elemental, 2 lightning storm, 2 maelstrom portal, Ragnaros, no bloodlust

Starting at rank 15. Hoping for rank 10 by tomorrow.


yah my midshamen has already made legend, course I piloted it from 3 to legend.
onto second account now...
1 user thanked duke44 for this useful post.
sepefeets on 12/9/2016(UTC)
adamrybicki1234
#1602 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 11:11:09 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4

duke44;43583 wrote:
yah my midshamen has already made legend, course I piloted it from 3 to legend.
onto second account now...


What decklist are you using? And can you show proof? You would be the first 1 to get rank 3 with this program probably
otkpotato
#1606 Posted : Wednesday, December 7, 2016 11:46:37 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 253
Location: UK

Thanks: 32 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 57 post(s)
adamrybicki1234;43587 wrote:
What decklist are you using? And can you show proof? You would be the first 1 to get rank 3 with this program probably


duke mentioned that he made changes to mulligan and SF last time. probably only sepe knows whether hes telling the truth
Dre
#1607 Posted : Thursday, December 8, 2016 3:48:03 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
I still couldnt find time to make new decks, also maybe not a bad thing since the meta is all over the place atm. But for my own sake i ran my unchanged Shaman yday. (with Barnes and Rag) ended up to rank 7 with 56% wr.... Might be luck but tbf if i can reach rank 7 on day 8 it can surely reach rank 5 still.

Having said this, ofcourse i will still make new decks. Also because iam tired of shaman xd But the Shaman is still fine atm imo.
Kraker01
#1609 Posted : Thursday, December 8, 2016 4:03:53 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 102

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Dre;43591 wrote:
I still couldnt find time to make new decks, also maybe not a bad thing since the meta is all over the place atm. But for my own sake i ran my unchanged Shaman yday. (with Barnes and Rag) ended up to rank 7 with 56% wr.... Might be luck but tbf if i can reach rank 7 on day 8 it can surely reach rank 5 still.

Having said this, ofcourse i will still make new decks. Also because iam tired of shaman xd But the Shaman is still fine atm imo.


Woah, such a great news!

Are you using Ragnaros and Thalnos?
Jadax
#1608 Posted : Thursday, December 8, 2016 4:22:42 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 42

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 7 post(s)
Dre;43591 wrote:
I still couldnt find time to make new decks, also maybe not a bad thing since the meta is all over the place atm. But for my own sake i ran my unchanged Shaman yday. (with Barnes and Rag) ended up to rank 7 with 56% wr.... Might be luck but tbf if i can reach rank 7 on day 8 it can surely reach rank 5 still.

Having said this, ofcourse i will still make new decks. Also because iam tired of shaman xd But the Shaman is still fine atm imo.

IMO shaman will remain top tier till LOE rotates out. I'm sure some form of jade midrange shaman will improve upon your previous deck, but for me the results so far have been sort of...bad. Maybe it's just a bit early in the season right now.
Dre
#1610 Posted : Thursday, December 8, 2016 5:41:25 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
Kraker01;43592 wrote:
Woah, such a great news!

Are you using Ragnaros and Thalnos?


Yes my full deck unchanged.
sepefeets
#1611 Posted : Thursday, December 8, 2016 9:14:53 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
We've seen this before, when an expansion comes out and really shakes up the meta then old decks that are strong all around can actually get stronger because the meta is no longer countering them.
emilcoff
#1604 Posted : Thursday, December 8, 2016 1:48:33 PM(UTC)
emilcoff


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 116
Location: Argentina

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 10 post(s)
adamrybicki1234;43587 wrote:
What decklist are you using? And can you show proof? You would be the first 1 to get rank 3 with this program probably


People also got legend.
REDARK
#1612 Posted : Thursday, December 8, 2016 3:07:56 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 5

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
i think the Jinyu Waterspeaker is strong against the aggro decks (especially the pirates decks) but i'm not sure the "classic" midrange shaman is good against the new Reno deck. But we will see !
170 Pages«<7778798081>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.163 seconds.