Alright Here are my preliminary results for midrange jade shaman:
The going was slow but still above 50% from rank 18-14. Of the three most popular meta decks, it did well against dragon priest only. Renolock had the board clears required to outlast the deck and Pirate warrior was too fast for the deck. If we had more hunters, mages, and rogues on ladder, I'm confident this deck would be doing a lot better.
The bot performed well, the only glaring problem it had was against buff pally as it didn't seem to register the buffs on the cards that were buffed in hand, so it would always trade badly but still think it was killing a minion... so basically every thing that got buffed in hand would trade 2 or 3 for one. Not a major problem at this point as it isn't a very popular deck.
charis2324;43556 wrote:http://pgw.udn.com.tw/gw/photo.php?u=http://uc.udn.com.tw/photo/2016/12/07/99/2925341.jpg&x=0&y=0&sw=0&sh=0&sl=W&fw=1050
Will this aggro variation be a better one?
I picked midrange because i had a mostly complete mulligan/combo for it that i knew performed well. I'd imagine though that if you went more aggro then your deck would perform worse against dragon priest, better against renolock, and about the same against pirate warrior.