Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
170 Pages«<1819202122>»
Project Rank 5
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
sepefeets
#389 Posted : Tuesday, August 9, 2016 10:27:39 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
@carins - You've been pretty good about giving feedback, even trying a deck that nobody else was any more. Even though you didn't have success with it, that still helped others avoid it too. Keep reporting how things are going, even if it's bad it still helps.

In general any huge misplays belong in the SF thread with a log, any deck micro-optimizations that can be fixed with configs should be talked about here. I know there's some blurred lines that can make it a little confusing but it's important to keep things organized so that the right info can be found in the right place.
Back to top
WWW
x014
#390 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:00:22 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 14

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 10 post(s)
thank you very much!
I reached rank 5 last season with Standard Aggro Shaman - Dre. Standard mode. in China server . winrate about 55%. but this season only reached rank 9.
I reached rank 6 this season with Standard Midrange Hunter - Dre. Standard mode. in China server winrate about 53%.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
sepefeets
#391 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 2:06:31 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
Talk about SF code should obviously be in the SF thread.
Back to top
WWW
zws
#392 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 8:14:45 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 64
Location: pl

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 20 post(s)
Hit 5 today with Dre's midrange hunter. Thanks Dre and sepefeets, you guys rock!

I suppose many good players are holding with laddering waiting for adventure, last season I could not get past 8 until the final week of the month.
Back to top
WWW
2 users thanked zws for this useful post.
Dre on 8/10/2016(UTC), sepefeets on 8/10/2016(UTC)
rffc
#393 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 9:46:42 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 33

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 8 post(s)
zws;40234 wrote:
Hit 5 today with Dre's midrange hunter. Thanks Dre and sepefeets, you guys rock!

I suppose many good players are holding with laddering waiting for adventure, last season I could not get past 8 until the final week of the month.


Which Silverfish version are u guys using ?
Back to top
WWW
Nitsujo
#397 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 9:54:02 AM(UTC)
Nitsujo

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 23
Location: USA

Thanks: 9 times
I found that using Silverfish and ZooLock runs out of time more than 25% of the board turns. This should be removed from the list unless settings are also provided that make it a working deck imo.

Anyone end able to speed it up?
Quote:

// This File: Settings.txt
// Author: Sepefeets
// Version: 0.1 (10-Jun-16)
// Deck Name: Zoolock
// Hero: Warlock
// Deck Type: Zoo (Aggro)

enfacehp = 29;
maxwide = 5000;
twotsamount = 250;
simEnemySecondTurn = true;
playarround = false;
playaroundprob = 30;
playaroundprob2 = 50;
enemyTurnMaxWideSecondTime = 160;
enemyTurnMaxWide = 16;
enemySecondTurnMaxWide = 16;
nextTurnDeep = 6;
nextTurnMaxWide = 16;
nextTurnTotalBoards = 160;
useSecretsPlayArround = true;
alpha = 50;
simulatePlacement = true;
useExternalProcess = true;
passiveWaiting = false;
behave = control;
concedeOnBadBoard = false;
speed = true;
- J
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
zws
#394 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:07:56 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 64
Location: pl

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 20 post(s)
rffc;40236 wrote:
Which Silverfish version are u guys using ?



I use 122.5SE
Back to top
WWW
rffc
#395 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:23:19 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 33

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 8 post(s)
zws;40238 wrote:
I use 122.5SE


oh thanks 4 the fast answer...

did u replace something?, kinda like the tundra rhino or is it the standard dre hunter ?

sincerely
Back to top
WWW
zws
#396 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:54:37 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 64
Location: pl

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 20 post(s)
rffc;40239 wrote:
oh thanks 4 the fast answer...

did u replace something?, kinda like the tundra rhino or is it the standard dre hunter ?

sincerely


I used deck with 1 rhino, 1 kodo, 1 deadly shot.
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked zws for this useful post.
rffc on 8/10/2016(UTC)
sepefeets
#399 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 2:46:29 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
@Nitsujo - The settings file for ANY deck is usually tuned for the deck builder's pc and there is no real solution to the problem of people having different hardware. I used rather low settings for my zoo lock with that in mind because zoo is computationally intensive with all the minions it floods the board with but if you see it roping then you need to lower the settings further or get better hardware.

Decks will only be removed if they fall completely out of meta. If they are still ~rank 10 then they will stay on the list because the meta could shift back or small tweaks could bring them back up. This thread isn't about copy pasting perfect settings, it's about collaborating to try to make them work.
Back to top
WWW
2 users thanked sepefeets for this useful post.
Nitsujo on 8/10/2016(UTC), Zo0oM on 8/11/2016(UTC)
Nitsujo
#400 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 5:25:36 PM(UTC)
Nitsujo

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 23
Location: USA

Thanks: 9 times
sepefeets;40248 wrote:
@Nitsujo - The settings file for ANY deck is usually tuned for the deck builder's pc and there is no real solution to the problem of people having different hardware. I used rather low settings for my zoo lock with that in mind because zoo is computationally intensive with all the minions it floods the board with but if you see it roping then you need to lower the settings further or get better hardware.

Decks will only be removed if they fall completely out of meta. If they are still ~rank 10 then they will stay on the list because the meta could shift back or small tweaks could bring them back up. This thread isn't about copy pasting perfect settings, it's about collaborating to try to make them work.


Thanks for the reply. I didn't know that the number of 5000 was the one that you had to adjust to do less calcs for slower PCs. The computer I have this running on at the moment is far from a gaming computer. I am considering lowering the value below 4000.

Is this the number that makes the bot perform faster on slower PCs? Is there anything else that iI am able to adjust?

Edit: I found the generator. I am trying out the settings below on my side PC Dell 660s (Old one)

enfacehp = 29;
maxwide = 3000;
twotsamount = 600;
simEnemySecondTurn = true;
playarround = true;
playaroundprob = 50;
playaroundprob2 = 80;
enemyTurnMaxWide = 12;
enemyTurnMaxWideSecondTime = 120;
enemySecondTurnMaxWide = 12;
nextTurnDeep = 6;
nextTurnMaxWide = 12;
nextTurnTotalBoards = 120;
useSecretsPlayArround = true;
alpha = 50;
simulatePlacement = true;
useExternalProcess = true;
passiveWaiting = false;
behave = control;
concedeOnBadBoard = false;
speed = false;
- J
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
sepefeets
#401 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 7:37:05 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
Most of the things in settings.txt affect performance but maxwide and twotsamount are probably the most important. If your system is dual core like google suggests it is then you're going to have pretty bad performance since HS and HR usually max out 1 core each so SF will have to contend with them more. Maybe someone with experience on weak hardware can chime in.

You might want to stick to midrange decks though, they usually have less minions on board which means way less possibilities to compute.
Back to top
WWW
x014
#402 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:15:35 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 14

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Now I reached rank 4 this season with Standard Midrange Hunter - Dre in Standard mode
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked x014 for this useful post.
sepefeets on 8/11/2016(UTC)
sadpwner
#403 Posted : Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:34:14 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 262
Location: somewhere

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 64 time(s) in 54 post(s)
Just wondering but does the weight of next turn line affect the opponent's simulation or is it just your next turn?
Back to top
WWW
sepefeets
#404 Posted : Thursday, August 11, 2016 1:13:58 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
sadpwner;40256 wrote:
Just wondering but does the weight of next turn line affect the opponent's simulation or is it just your next turn?

I'm starting to think you haven't ever read the comments in the default settings file.


@everyone - While working on other stuff I just noticed the "alpha" setting and I don't think I've ever seen anybody change it. It controls how much emphasis is put on your 2nd turn sim results (lots of guessing) vs your 1st (current) turn sim results. I think we should experiment with it, especially lower values, and see how it affects results.
Back to top
WWW
sadpwner
#405 Posted : Thursday, August 11, 2016 1:37:06 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 262
Location: somewhere

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 64 time(s) in 54 post(s)
sepefeets;40259 wrote:
I'm starting to think you haven't ever read the comments in the default settings file.


@everyone - While working on other stuff I just noticed the "alpha" setting and I don't think I've ever seen anybody change it. It controls how much emphasis is put on your 2nd turn sim results (lots of guessing) vs your 1st (current) turn sim results. I think we should experiment with it, especially lower values, and see how it affects results.


I was referring to the alpha setting lol. I've read all the comments. It says "weight of the second turn in calculation (0<= alpha <= 100)". That could refer to either your turn 2nd turn or the 2nd turn in the calculation i.e the opponent's turn.

I've been tampering with it for the last month and I have it on my zoo deck at 40. The setting I leave it on is based on how important I think the second turn is compared to the current turn.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
carins
#406 Posted : Thursday, August 11, 2016 3:04:39 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 72

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 15 post(s)
Bot had a decent day with Standard Midrange Hunter:

http://i.imgur.com/jFLwMZD.jpg

It can't beat mages, but Priest / Druid / Hunter seem to be favorable. Obviously, not a ton of games. I plan to run it all day tomorrow while I'm at work (yes, I know it's patch day, partially why I'm curious how the bot will react) and then I'll report when I get home on how it did. Is everything going to get messed up tomorrow and the subsequent weeks with the patch as the bot has no idea how to deal with a Menagerie Warden or an Arcane Giant or a Barnes etc.?
Back to top
WWW
carins
#407 Posted : Thursday, August 11, 2016 9:12:09 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 72

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 15 post(s)
http://i.imgur.com/AomKD8V.jpg

Another 110+ games, the bot broke even and is still rank 11. Not sure how people are hitting 4, 5 with it 8 days into the season when it can't even break 10 for me
Back to top
WWW
dezer
#408 Posted : Friday, August 12, 2016 8:18:23 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 1
Location: proland
carins;40272 wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/AomKD8V.jpg

Another 110+ games, the bot broke even and is still rank 11. Not sure how people are hitting 4, 5 with it 8 days into the season when it can't even break 10 for me



before rank 5 luck is pretty much everything
you can climb with winrate below 50% if you get lucky winstreaks
Back to top
WWW
contagious86
#409 Posted : Friday, August 12, 2016 1:03:37 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 40

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 15 post(s)
Should we open a new topic "Project Legend" ? :)
Back to top
WWW
170 Pages«<1819202122>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.192 seconds.