Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

170 Pages«<145146147148149>»
Project Rank 5
CraftSteamG
#2963 Posted : Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:40:13 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 62

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 23 post(s)
andric11;46952 wrote:
Can anyone confirm I'm not missing something?

I use AutoSwitchClass, pick the deck I want to use and click done. It loads silverfish and hearthranger where I set up which deck to use, to use silver.dll and I click play.
I got my .txt files from here
Silverfish is also able to read the combo, mulligan and settings txt files and is doing a good job calculating every board. It's just that the plays are absolutely wrong.

I am of course using the latest version of everything on Windows 7.



Try without autoswitchclass, some people had that exact problem, and once they did it manually the bot did a ton better
duke44
#2962 Posted : Thursday, March 23, 2017 2:08:50 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 133

Was thanked: 39 time(s) in 24 post(s)
andric11;46952 wrote:
Can anyone confirm I'm not missing something?

I use AutoSwitchClass, pick the deck I want to use and click done. It loads silverfish and hearthranger where I set up which deck to use, to use silver.dll and I click play.
I got my .txt files from here
Silverfish is also able to read the combo, mulligan and settings txt files and is doing a good job calculating every board. It's just that the plays are absolutely wrong.

I am of course using the latest version of everything on Windows 7.

I would uninstall autoswitchclass as its not needed, silverfish will switch classes for you.
andric11
#2964 Posted : Thursday, March 23, 2017 2:39:27 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 7

Thank you duke44 and CraftSteamG for replying so fast. I tried starting Hearthstone, then silverfish, then Hearthranger and pressing play. Still incredibly stupid plays:

http://pastebin.com/py5JP3j0
Bot literally passed first turn with a N'zoth's first mate in hand.

http://pastebin.com/jJyAPw9v
Empty board, 1 mana left, ship's cannon on board, Patches in hand. Ends turn with 1 mana left and patches not played.
wtf??

If you look into the logs it says that HR is too fast, I don't really know what to do about that though. Especially weird since the board is completely empty but it refuses to play a 1 drop.

Edit: It just played Sir Finley and got Paladin, Hunter and Warlock Heropower. It chose paladin, didn't attack with patches and ended turn. Seriously what the fuck?
jquema1
#2945 Posted : Thursday, March 23, 2017 6:10:18 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 60

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
duke44;46883 wrote:
Hit Rank 4/5 on 3 Accounts with this new midrange Shamen

deck:
// This File: decklist.txt
// Author: Duke44
// Version: 2.1 (Mar.1.2017)
// Deck Name: Jade Midrage Shaman
// Hero: Shaman
// Deck Type: Midrange (control)

1 Cost:
Lightning Bolt x2
Tunnel Trogg x2
2 Cost:
Flametongue Totem x2
Jade Claws x2
Totem Golem x2
Maelstrom Portal x2
3 Cost:
Feral Spirit x2
Hex x2
Lightning Storm x2
Mana Tide Totem x1
4 Cost:
Jade Lightning x2
Jinyu waterspeaker x1
5 Cost:
Bloodlust x1
Thunderbluff Valiant x1
6 Cost:
Thing from Below x2

Neutral
2 Cost:
Bloodmage Thalnos x1
5 Cost:
Azure Drake x2
6 Cost:
Aya Blackpaw x1



At rank 5 with changes on the decklist

- 1 Thunderbluff Valiant
- 1 Blood Lust
- 1 Lightning Storm
- 2 Feral Spirit
-1 Bloodmage Thalnos

+ 2 Jade Spirit
+ 2 Jade Chieftain
+ 1 Ragnaros
+ 1 Devolve
BongoBengt
#2960 Posted : Thursday, March 23, 2017 6:22:55 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 89
Location: Nada

Thanks: 12 times
Was thanked: 23 time(s) in 20 post(s)
charis2324;46932 wrote:
What? Silverfish can use Edwin correctly?

It is the 23th of March now.Is Vision A.I coming? :)



Yes. I have looked into it, and it plays it pretty damn well.
I was surprised myself.
BongoBengt
#2965 Posted : Thursday, March 23, 2017 6:35:03 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 89
Location: Nada

Thanks: 12 times
Was thanked: 23 time(s) in 20 post(s)
So here is the Rouge deck I used to hit rank 5... (Forgot to mention Xaril before, so it's actually 5 legendary cards).
Played some more since last time and it's still at rank 5 1 star (EU).
Going to reset stats and leave it on tonight and see how it goes.

As you can see there can be some more tweaking in combo etc. But since v0.1 worked pretty well I'm leaving for now.



settings.txt


_mulligan.txt


_combo.txt


Hope you can get some wins out of it.
1 user thanked BongoBengt for this useful post.
Iso on 3/26/2017(UTC)
pmme
#2966 Posted : Thursday, March 23, 2017 8:35:02 PM(UTC)
pmme

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I read something about it in here earlier, but I wasn't sure.

With the aggro warrior decks, are the rules supposed to be set to Rush in HR? Someone mentioned it, but I wasn't sure. I set it to Rush and the bot now does things like play Deckhand and Bloodsail Raider with no weapon equipped, when set to Default it would typically wait until a weapon was equipped. It just plays them as soon as it can afford them.

Thanks
bunnyfool
#2967 Posted : Friday, March 24, 2017 12:20:24 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 29

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Well the bot finally did it, got to rank 5. I used the settings and combo stuff provided, plus that fixed Wild Pirate Warrior mulligan. Honestly? I checked the performance, and apparently my bot was lucky enough to fight the same guy multiple times because it was at night, when no one else was awake. Got me to Rank 5 though, so I can't complain. Oddly enough, it has a less than 50% winrate. I think its just that when it did win, it was during a streak, so it got boosted to rank 5. So if your bot is at 48% or 49%, etc. Don't lose hope! It's literally just luck at this point.
scottbreak
#2968 Posted : Friday, March 24, 2017 2:02:10 AM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
bunnyfool;46972 wrote:
Well the bot finally did it, got to rank 5. I used the settings and combo stuff provided, plus that fixed Wild Pirate Warrior mulligan. Honestly? I checked the performance, and apparently my bot was lucky enough to fight the same guy multiple times because it was at night, when no one else was awake. Got me to Rank 5 though, so I can't complain. Oddly enough, it has a less than 50% winrate. I think its just that when it did win, it was during a streak, so it got boosted to rank 5. So if your bot is at 48% or 49%, etc. Don't lose hope! It's literally just luck at this point.


You don't need a 50% win rate to hit Rank 5. I hit Rank 5 on the 4th day of the season with a 46.6% win rate.
Silversurfer3456
#2969 Posted : Friday, March 24, 2017 2:10:28 AM(UTC)
Silversurfer3456

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 18
Location: Australia

Thanks: 44 times
Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 9 post(s)
Golden Priest
Results:

Deck: Dragon Priest - BotWhat

Settings

_Mulligan.txt

_discovery.txt

Silverfish: V125.3SE
Server: EU
System: i5 4690, H97 Gaming3, SSD
Thanks to: BotWhat
2 users thanked Silversurfer3456 for this useful post.
DarkFennec on 3/24/2017(UTC), mrgodai on 3/24/2017(UTC)
alexmorgan202
#2866 Posted : Friday, March 24, 2017 4:50:07 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 3

Thanks: 1 times
duke44;46916 wrote:
which deck are you looking for? Im currently working on like 6 :)

Sorry lol I forgot to say which. I'm talking about the jade druid deck.
DarkFennec
#2970 Posted : Friday, March 24, 2017 6:33:25 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 90

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
No _combo.txt?
you let the bot run only with this files? :)

thanks



Silversurfer3456;46976 wrote:
Golden Priest
Results:

Deck: Dragon Priest - BotWhat

Settings

_Mulligan.txt

_discovery.txt

Silverfish: V125.3SE
Server: EU
System: i5 4690, H97 Gaming3, SSD
Thanks to: BotWhat

rangerrick
#2979 Posted : Friday, March 24, 2017 4:51:20 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 19

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Using scottbreak STANDARD PIRATE WARRIOR with the newest mulligan settings from post #2947 I achieved rank 4 on NA in standard and today using the exact same deck and setting it is at Rank 4 on NA in wild starting from Rank 15
1 user thanked rangerrick for this useful post.
scottbreak on 3/24/2017(UTC)
scottbreak
#2980 Posted : Friday, March 24, 2017 5:02:59 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
rangerrick;46993 wrote:
Using scottbreak STANDARD PIRATE WARRIOR with the newest mulligan settings from post #2947 I achieved rank 4 on NA in standard and today using the exact same deck and setting it is at Rank 4 on NA in wild starting from Rank 15

Did you sub in the Southsea Captain?
1 user thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
rangerrick on 3/25/2017(UTC)
DarkFennec
#2971 Posted : Friday, March 24, 2017 5:43:50 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 90

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Reached rank 4 on EU standard! (started from rank 14 to 4)
i used the starting version because i dont have Confessor Paletress.

good job :)



Silversurfer3456;46976 wrote:
Golden Priest
Results:

Deck: Dragon Priest - BotWhat

Settings

_Mulligan.txt

_discovery.txt

Silverfish: V125.3SE
Server: EU
System: i5 4690, H97 Gaming3, SSD
Thanks to: BotWhat

2 users thanked DarkFennec for this useful post.
Silversurfer3456 on 3/24/2017(UTC), JoyAdmin on 3/25/2017(UTC)
rangerrick
#2981 Posted : Saturday, March 25, 2017 1:11:15 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 19

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
scottbreak;46994 wrote:
Did you sub in the Southsea Captain?


No Subs just the straight list
wolverine037
#2982 Posted : Saturday, March 25, 2017 6:02:59 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 21

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Hey all, scottbreak wild pirate warrior list got to rank 4 and 4 stars, but the rank 5 and up is infested with Reno decks, reno all around
thanks scott and sepe for the effort
1 user thanked wolverine037 for this useful post.
scottbreak on 3/25/2017(UTC)
lucasagostini1
#2983 Posted : Saturday, March 25, 2017 8:20:51 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 3

wolverine037;47004 wrote:
Hey all, scottbreak wild pirate warrior list got to rank 4 and 4 stars, but the rank 5 and up is infested with Reno decks, reno all around
thanks scott and sepe for the effort


I'm trying to use this list for a while (15 hours) to get from 10 to 5, and so far no luck, I'm still rank 9, any tips for improving the win rate of the bot?
pmme
#2986 Posted : Saturday, March 25, 2017 11:00:15 AM(UTC)
pmme

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Ran the Standard Pirate Warrior a little bit yesterday afternoon with a 43% win rate between ranks 10-7. I hit 6 with it a couple weeks ago but not since. Still struggling for 5. Wondering if I should tech in the Captain.
scottbreak
#2987 Posted : Saturday, March 25, 2017 12:52:17 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
pmme;47008 wrote:
Ran the Standard Pirate Warrior a little bit yesterday afternoon with a 43% win rate between ranks 10-7. I hit 6 with it a couple weeks ago but not since. Still struggling for 5. Wondering if I should tech in the Captain.

Try subbing +2 Southsea Captain -1 Bash -1 Mortal Strike, and use the updated mulligan...good luck~!
170 Pages«<145146147148149>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.618 seconds.