Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
170 Pages«<130131132133134>»
Project Rank 5
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
duke44
#2640 Posted : Friday, February 17, 2017 11:27:55 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 133

Was thanked: 39 time(s) in 24 post(s)
Dre;45945 wrote:
Thunder buff valiant you mean, yeah well it kinda droped out of the meta some time ago. It's still a great card, i used it in all my previous midrange shaman's. But it just not does so well anymore nowdays.

Dre this card is incredible. I still think it has a place in the deck as a 1 of.
Back to top
WWW
duke44
#2666 Posted : Friday, February 17, 2017 11:34:28 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 133

Was thanked: 39 time(s) in 24 post(s)
ustica;45972 wrote:
Rank 4
Rank 4 obtained using Scott's Wild Aggro Pirate

After reaching rank 5, I found the bot being back at rank 9.
Just letting the bot play dailies until there is gold to earn, I discovered it made it back to rank 5 and even rank 4.

I am now tempted to try to reach Legend but I am not sure what to expect at such lower ranks. I think Wild Aggro Pirate won't be enough.
Any suggestion?


Ive never seen the bot go higher than 3, but you can try.
Generally you want to get it to 5 then play by hand.
Back to top
WWW
tanakayuuta
#2634 Posted : Friday, February 17, 2017 11:58:48 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9
Location: Singapore

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Dre;45944 wrote:
Impossible, Either your setup is wrong or the settings are to high for your pc.


used the files in your sig... at standard Asia server. my pc is i7 3770k and 16gb ram tho. no roping.
Back to top
WWW
Dre
#2635 Posted : Friday, February 17, 2017 12:12:25 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
tanakayuuta;45979 wrote:
used the files in your sig... at standard Asia server. my pc is i7 3770k and 16gb ram tho. no roping.


Are you sure you are using the lastest version of silverfish? Remember that you have to update it after each Hearthranger update. Since the silverfish packed with Hearthranger is a very old one.

I'am aware of region-meta's, rank-meta's and even time-meta's but the difference is just to big. I got rank 5 on 2 accounts with the deck very fast.
Back to top
WWW
GreatAgain
#2643 Posted : Friday, February 17, 2017 12:37:43 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 3
Dre;45921 wrote:
Yesterday I went from rank 7 to rank 4 with 64% wr with the latest version of my deck (in my signature currently, since sepe is away for a few days i think :))



I think cardwise the deck is pretty solid atm, it the exact copy of the "best" midrange deck that metastats suggest (link here), and it also the best one for the bot in my opinion

@mary7 Bran is nice, but the bot doesnt like him (because it doesnt know your remaining cards and oponent deck), bloodlust is nice and the bot can be lucky with it. But its more luck, bot uses it often to clear a mediocre board aswell or even just a single big minion. For the bot this is more like a "win-more" card. In all my wins in my tests i either didnt draw or use it or I would have won without it aswell.

In general for the bot = minions > spells


Tried your settings and the deck, wasn't as successful as you. (28-31)
Is it anything I could be doing wrong?
First 10 games were 8-2 tho :(
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
botwhat
#2669 Posted : Friday, February 17, 2017 2:33:00 PM(UTC)
botwhat


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 162

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 225 time(s) in 58 post(s)
Well I just realized that I think I was still running an old version of silverfish. Possibly not even the one everybody else is using. I noticed it today when I updated to the new version and saw that the upgrade available link is on all the time now. Hadn't seen that before so did a little digging and figured out that is expected. So I can't honestly say if any of my testing has been the same as everybody else's I updgraded everything and will restest the decks I'm using a post updates in a few days.
Back to top
WWW
mrgodai
#2670 Posted : Friday, February 17, 2017 3:09:44 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 224
Location: FL

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 41 post(s)
botwhat;45982 wrote:
Well I just realized that I think I was still running an old version of silverfish. Possibly not even the one everybody else is using. I noticed it today when I updated to the new version and saw that the upgrade available link is on all the time now. Hadn't seen that before so did a little digging and figured out that is expected. So I can't honestly say if any of my testing has been the same as everybody else's I updgraded everything and will restest the decks I'm using a post updates in a few days.



if you get your silverfish from the upgrade available link, you are going to have a bad time.

all the decks and files in this thread works only with sepefeet's version, which is available in the first post.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
Neravian
#2671 Posted : Friday, February 17, 2017 7:23:34 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 6

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Finally! Rank 5
http://scr.hu/2hzc/369lm

Thanks to scottbreak with his Pirate Aggro Warrior - scottbreak (wild list)
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked Neravian for this useful post.
scottbreak on 2/19/2017(UTC)
ustica
#2667 Posted : Friday, February 17, 2017 7:41:04 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 132
Location: Malta

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 20 post(s)
duke44;45978 wrote:
Ive never seen the bot go higher than 3, but you can try.
Generally you want to get it to 5 then play by hand.


that's what I meant: I want to try to reach legend playing by hand, but I am unsure what deck would work best.
I hear there's a lot of control decks in lower ranks, is it true?
Back to top
WWW
tanakayuuta
#2636 Posted : Saturday, February 18, 2017 4:56:06 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9
Location: Singapore

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Dre;45980 wrote:
Are you sure you are using the lastest version of silverfish? Remember that you have to update it after each Hearthranger update. Since the silverfish packed with Hearthranger is a very old one.

I'am aware of region-meta's, rank-meta's and even time-meta's but the difference is just to big. I got rank 5 on 2 accounts with the deck very fast.


yeahs everything is updated. I always use fresh new files after every update.

after 2 days it suddenly got better. now i'm at 54% WR (including all the losses from the first 2 days)

thanks! may be just some bugs that I don't know how to replicate.
Back to top
WWW
spugna
#2672 Posted : Saturday, February 18, 2017 7:22:07 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 6

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)


i confirm that i can't reach rank 5... i use the Jade Aggro Shaman-Dre but, as you can see, the bot still have an orrible matchup against other shamans and now we are at the end of the season...
the higher rank the bot have reached is rank 11, yesterday the bot fell down to rank 15... i play in Europe server...

any suggestion??
Back to top
WWW
Ailma
#2674 Posted : Saturday, February 18, 2017 10:23:45 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 35

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 8 post(s)
I have encountered the same problem as spungna.

I have used in this season, the MID & Agrro versions of Dre, with WR under 40%.

This week, I tested the pirate version of Scottbreak, and even though I improved the WR% to 47-49, I see the problem is against shamans and warriors.

Against these classes the WR is very low. Any idea to improve?

My statistics for these last days are:

http://es.zimagez.com/zimage/piratas0.php

I offer to test 24/7, with my bot.All files are up to date and I have an i7 with 16 Gb of ram.

Greetings
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
mary7
#2675 Posted : Saturday, February 18, 2017 1:07:39 PM(UTC)
mary7


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 175

Thanks: 206 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 70 post(s)
take 5 with Dre's mid shaman
50%

concedeOnBadBoard
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked mary7 for this useful post.
Dre on 2/18/2017(UTC)
Kurtka
#2676 Posted : Saturday, February 18, 2017 2:27:43 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 72

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 19 post(s)
mary7;45994 wrote:
take 5 with Dre's mid shaman
50%




Could not help myself:
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked Kurtka for this useful post.
mary7 on 2/20/2017(UTC)
tobii05
#2677 Posted : Saturday, February 18, 2017 6:26:11 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 18

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Made a new version of the deck this is what i got afther 1052 Min :)

I got to rank 6 today as well with this deck i will post deck list tomarrow cuz im still making some changes!
Back to top
WWW
ustica
#2673 Posted : Saturday, February 18, 2017 9:20:31 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 132
Location: Malta

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 20 post(s)
spugna;45991 wrote:


i confirm that i can't reach rank 5... i use the Jade Aggro Shaman-Dre but, as you can see, the bot still have an orrible matchup against other shamans and now we are at the end of the season...
the higher rank the bot have reached is rank 11, yesterday the bot fell down to rank 15... i play in Europe server...

any suggestion??


prova il Pirate Warrior di Scott. In una settimana ho fatto rank 5 prima e poi sono tornato a 9 e poi di nuovo a 4. Lascialo andare tutta la notte.
Back to top
WWW
ilovezim
#2678 Posted : Sunday, February 19, 2017 7:40:58 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 8

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
This might be stupid question but is there any difference what deck rules I use? For example what will change if I switch from Deckrules_rush to deckrules_default when grinding with pirate warrior?
Back to top
WWW
Zarozym
#2679 Posted : Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:42:36 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 30

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 7 post(s)
ilovezim;46002 wrote:
This might be stupid question but is there any difference what deck rules I use? For example what will change if I switch from Deckrules_rush to deckrules_default when grinding with pirate warrior?


No. Silverfish supercedes those.
Back to top
WWW
TheRandomOne
#2680 Posted : Sunday, February 19, 2017 10:47:56 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 31

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 16 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Hit rank 5 again in wild Europe with scottbreaks pirate deck.

This is probably the fastest i've ever hit rank 5. Pretty sure i started at rank 18 or something like that.

Winrate
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
2 users thanked TheRandomOne for this useful post.
Kurtka on 2/19/2017(UTC), scottbreak on 2/20/2017(UTC)
Athanatos
#2682 Posted : Sunday, February 19, 2017 4:13:52 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 72

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 14 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Hey @Dre,
I've been running your midrange jade shaman lately.
I have lower settings cause my pc is slow, so no rank 5 yet but that's irrelevant to what I want to say.

I feel like the mulligan of the deck is really inconsistent.
It almost always mulligans the entire hand, many times dumping 1 or 2 mana cards that at the very least could be played on the first or second turn.
As a result it's very inconsistent as far as the times it actually gets a good starting hand.
If I understand the deck correctly, it's basically a jade shaman that takes advantage of the explosiveness that a pirate shaman has, so basically the mulligan should be the same as a pirate shaman, am I not correct on this?

Also I really dislike coining out the jade claws on turn one. The bot does it constantly. I disliked it with totem golem buth at least then you get a 3/4 on turn one.
With this play your opponent may just play an ooze and win the game at that very moment.
I don't know if your data suggests that it's the best play but when I play, most of the time I won't do it even if it's my only turn one play and it ends up better.
It keeps open options for a different two mana play, either a hero power or a top deck, plus the opponent may feel confident and put a 2 mana 2 health minion in play.
If your data suggests otherwise don't mind me, but I really believe there should be a combo discouraging coining out jade claws on turn one.
Would this do it?
// [Discourage] [0] The Coin (GAME_005) + [2] Jade Claws x2 (CFM_717)
GAME_005,0;CFM_717,0;mana:1;bonus:-20;hero:shaman
I'm not sure if the negative bonus works

Lastly I want to say that when playing by myself with the deck, missing only bloodmage thalnos, replaced by kobold geomancer. I also replaced one Jinyu waterspeaker with bloodlust and the thing is that 90% of my wins is because of bloodlust.
I honestly think it should be included instead of a second Jinyu or maybe even Azure Drake, even if the bot generally misuses it sometimes.
Back to top
WWW
170 Pages«<130131132133134>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.186 seconds.