Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

170 Pages«<128129130131132>»
Project Rank 5
roborock
#2623 Posted : Wednesday, February 15, 2017 5:24:09 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 5

OK i done the 2nd storm instead of devote! thnx for the info.

i use deck rules default. is that ok? or is there something better for this?
syrk08
#2622 Posted : Wednesday, February 15, 2017 7:02:59 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 31

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
mrgodai;45906 wrote:
dont use devolve, use 2nd lightning storm or brann

you can try these in settings if they are not already, higher number offers diminished returns

maxwide = 7000;
twotsamount = 1400;


Good note but for his deck i would think 1300 and 6500 should be enough.
mary7
#2624 Posted : Wednesday, February 15, 2017 7:18:53 PM(UTC)
mary7


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 175

Thanks: 206 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 70 post(s)
im really happy with Anyzh again actualize mid deck,
+ 2x Thing from Below lower brann or bloodlust as is imho
devolve have strike in sepe thread
maxwide = 7000 just insane for big tables

but test must go on! =)
concedeOnBadBoard
Anyzh
#2625 Posted : Wednesday, February 15, 2017 7:45:23 PM(UTC)
Anyzh


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 68

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 24 time(s) in 17 post(s)
i refined my deck too, with new files. thanks again Dre!
Had 70% for 20 games win. I think its hard to bot at night. Let it run again and check stats tomorrow. (atm 66% rank 7, but bot got 4 like i wrote yesterday)
1 user thanked Anyzh for this useful post.
mary7 on 2/15/2017(UTC)
tobii05
#2608 Posted : Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:31:50 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 18

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Dre;45891 wrote:
Nice!

Yeah make sure you take out devolve, it does more wrong then good atm, also in the combo I added:

// Cardvalue HEx (EX1_246)
cardvalue:EX1_246,-2

Because often it used a lot of resource to kill a big minion with a hex in hand, this value fixed 4 misplays i found with hex. In the link i posted before this is allready updated. combo.txt is now version 1.1


I'am testing and making chnages myself aswell, if you have any suggestions - i'am Always open to it after i tested it.




yeah i took out the disolve and added

1x TFB

working good atm trying out some setting as we speak might report back later! on rank 9 atm
botwhat
#2626 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 1:04:51 AM(UTC)
botwhat


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 162

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 225 time(s) in 58 post(s)
Ok so here's my updated Dragon Priest files.

I've done a lot of work on the discovery file. I still plan to build this out more as I have time. from my observations the bot will typically pick the cheapest card when there are better options. So because we have a number of discovery cards the first thing I did was make dragon cards the highest priority. I did this for 2 reasons. first and hopefully most obviously our deck relies heavily on dragons. Second the netherspite historian card allows up to dragons. I picked through all the available dragons that are option and put them in an order that I felt I would pick them by. This part of the list is a work in progress as I'll change the weighting around. Then after the dragons I added the top cards from the warrior and shaman classes since we see them the most. Drakonid operative allows us to pick cards from our opponents deck. It's very hard to program this but over time my plans are to contiune to add cards from each of the popular meta decks to the list to cover drakonid operative. The dragon section should help cover mirror fights and dragon warrior as well. I could use some help with the combo's I'm still trying to wrap my head around how to write those properly but some I would like to see are bran into netherspite historian or brann into drakonid operative.

I've been running about a 50% win rate before I added all the mulligans to the file. I think this will bump up the win % a lot. Please test it out and let me know if it works. I'm running it overnight and I'll post my results tomorrow currently at rank 13

settings.txt


_Mulligan.txt


_discovery.txt
3 users thanked botwhat for this useful post.
Silversurfer3456 on 2/16/2017(UTC), trazobone on 2/18/2017(UTC), genelu on 3/6/2017(UTC)
Dre
#2628 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:40:00 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
Yesterday I went from rank 7 to rank 4 with 64% wr with the latest version of my deck (in my signature currently, since sepe is away for a few days i think :))



I think cardwise the deck is pretty solid atm, it the exact copy of the "best" midrange deck that metastats suggest (link here), and it also the best one for the bot in my opinion

@mary7 Bran is nice, but the bot doesnt like him (because it doesnt know your remaining cards and oponent deck), bloodlust is nice and the bot can be lucky with it. But its more luck, bot uses it often to clear a mediocre board aswell or even just a single big minion. For the bot this is more like a "win-more" card. In all my wins in my tests i either didnt draw or use it or I would have won without it aswell.

In general for the bot = minions > spells
3 users thanked Dre for this useful post.
mary7 on 2/16/2017(UTC), tobii05 on 2/16/2017(UTC), sepefeets on 2/16/2017(UTC)
tobii05
#2629 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 7:06:07 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 18

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Dre;45921 wrote:
Yesterday I went from rank 7 to rank 4 with 64% wr with the latest version of my deck (in my signature currently, since sepe is away for a few days i think :))



I think cardwise the deck is pretty solid atm, it the exact copy of the "best" midrange deck that metastats suggest (link here), and it also the best one for the bot in my opinion

@mary7 Bran is nice, but the bot doesnt like him (because it doesnt know your remaining cards and oponent deck), bloodlust is nice and the bot can be lucky with it. But its more luck, bot uses it often to clear a mediocre board aswell or even just a single big minion. For the bot this is more like a "win-more" card. In all my wins in my tests i either didnt draw or use it or I would have won without it aswell.

In general for the bot = minions > spells



i'll test out that deck as well and see how much win rate i can get and maybe make a few changes i'll keep you updated! thanks for the list and setting etc... :)
roborock
#2644 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 7:08:06 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 5

Went yesterday night from 14 to 11

EU

Still need more dust :O



What deck rules should i use? At the moment, i use DeckRules default. Gonna test Rush later.

I got no time to create own deckrules atm
otkpotato
#2645 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 7:08:31 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 253
Location: UK

Thanks: 32 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 57 post(s)
i know its early but we should all be mentally prepared for a huge meta shakeup next season.
Dre
#2646 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 7:13:36 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
otkpotato;45927 wrote:
i know its early but we should all be mentally prepared for a huge meta shakeup next season.


by nerfing 2 cards sligthly? nah. I think it will hurt aggro shaman but for midrange shaman (currently #2 tier 1) not so much. Time will tell though.
Kurtka
#2648 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:43:43 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 72

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 26 time(s) in 19 post(s)
Stuck at rank 6-7 playing against golden portraits with legendary cardbacks. I forgot how default portraits looks like already.

I think i need to change timezone again.
tanakayuuta
#2632 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:02:44 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9
Location: Singapore

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Dre;45921 wrote:
Yesterday I went from rank 7 to rank 4 with 64% wr with the latest version of my deck (in my signature currently, since sepe is away for a few days i think :))



I think cardwise the deck is pretty solid atm, it the exact copy of the "best" midrange deck that metastats suggest (link here), and it also the best one for the bot in my opinion

@mary7 Bran is nice, but the bot doesnt like him (because it doesnt know your remaining cards and oponent deck), bloodlust is nice and the bot can be lucky with it. But its more luck, bot uses it often to clear a mediocre board aswell or even just a single big minion. For the bot this is more like a "win-more" card. In all my wins in my tests i either didnt draw or use it or I would have won without it aswell.

In general for the bot = minions > spells


I used your files and ended up at rank 18... with a WR of 20%.
syrk08
#2647 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:13:37 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 31

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Dre;45928 wrote:
by nerfing 2 cards sligthly? nah. I think it will hurt aggro shaman but for midrange shaman (currently #2 tier 1) not so much. Time will tell though.


Midrange Shamen with bloodlust and the 5 resource buy that buffs totems attacks will bring midrange to a top 2 deck.
syrk08
#2649 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:15:09 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 31

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Kurtka;45931 wrote:
Stuck at rank 6-7 playing against golden portraits with legendary cardbacks. I forgot how default portraits looks like already.

I think i need to change timezone again.


I can get you up to legend if you want, but my time is valueable :)
syrk08
#2638 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:17:56 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 31

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Dre;45921 wrote:
Yesterday I went from rank 7 to rank 4 with 64% wr with the latest version of my deck (in my signature currently, since sepe is away for a few days i think :))



I think cardwise the deck is pretty solid atm, it the exact copy of the "best" midrange deck that metastats suggest (link here), and it also the best one for the bot in my opinion

@mary7 Bran is nice, but the bot doesnt like him (because it doesnt know your remaining cards and oponent deck), bloodlust is nice and the bot can be lucky with it. But its more luck, bot uses it often to clear a mediocre board aswell or even just a single big minion. For the bot this is more like a "win-more" card. In all my wins in my tests i either didnt draw or use it or I would have won without it aswell.

In general for the bot = minions > spells

I agree with the more minions >= spells but the bot plays best with the 5 resouce minion that grants +2 attack to all totems when you use the hero power.
syrk08
#2630 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:19:37 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 31

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
tobii05;45925 wrote:
i'll test out that deck as well and see how much win rate i can get and maybe make a few changes i'll keep you updated! thanks for the list and setting etc... :)

In other news, hit rank 3 last night with Dres Latest Midrange Jade Shamen - only changes i made was more control to improve the matchup against agro.
The metagame will shift up march 15th, well see the return of Lock Zoo, and the rise of Druid/Rogue Jade.
2 users thanked syrk08 for this useful post.
Dre on 2/16/2017(UTC), sepefeets on 2/16/2017(UTC)
Dre
#2633 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 1:09:56 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
tanakayuuta;45939 wrote:
I used your files and ended up at rank 18... with a WR of 20%.


Impossible, Either your setup is wrong or the settings are to high for your pc.
Dre
#2639 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 1:10:53 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
syrk08;45942 wrote:
I agree with the more minions >= spells but the bot plays best with the 5 resouce minion that grants +2 attack to all totems when you use the hero power.


Thunder buff valiant you mean, yeah well it kinda droped out of the meta some time ago. It's still a great card, i used it in all my previous midrange shaman's. But it just not does so well anymore nowdays.
1 user thanked Dre for this useful post.
mary7 on 2/16/2017(UTC)
sepefeets
#2619 Posted : Thursday, February 16, 2017 1:15:48 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
lamerena;45898 wrote:
Sorry can i ask how do we know whether _discovery.txt get read by silverfish? Because the bot always discover the wrong hero power when using sir finely, currently using scottbreak Standard Aggro Jade Shaman which is at #2543

Check the top of the latest silverlog while running it or watch the console to see what files it loads at the start of the first match.
1 user thanked sepefeets for this useful post.
lamerena on 2/16/2017(UTC)
170 Pages«<128129130131132>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.366 seconds.