Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

170 Pages«<111112113114115>»
Project Rank 5
DarkFennec
#2277 Posted : Tuesday, January 17, 2017 1:26:25 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 90

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
so, (if this is not the right place, move my post because i was not sure for the right place) i tweaked with the settings and played an arena with the bot this afternoon. the bot used priest as hero and this is the deck made by the bot.
I got an 8-3 win rate:
win rate

deck list

this is the setting i used for the arena:
1 user thanked DarkFennec for this useful post.
HeartBuddy on 1/18/2017(UTC)
xxaklo
#2254 Posted : Tuesday, January 17, 2017 1:30:10 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 1

scottbreak;45103 wrote:
Thanks so much Dre! I have been focusing on Pirate Warrior, so your focus on Aggro Jade Shaman is welcome and wanted!

Hi Scott
I have a question into the account of an agro var the standard.
Why the bot doesn't attack the pirate of Patches the Pirate? He doesn't use him at all. Help please.
omgfrost
#2278 Posted : Tuesday, January 17, 2017 1:38:10 PM(UTC)
omgfrost


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 324

Thanks: 67 times
Was thanked: 83 time(s) in 66 post(s)
DarkFennec;45152 wrote:
so, (if this is not the right place, move my post because i was not sure for the right place) i tweaked with the settings and played an arena with the bot this afternoon. the bot used priest as hero and this is the deck made by the bot.
I got an 8-3 win rate:
win rate

deck list

this is the setting i used for the arena:

Awesome! Would you mind sharing the mulligan also since the most updated one is before karazhan here? :D
Also how is it going with the Reno Deck?
DarkFennec
#2279 Posted : Tuesday, January 17, 2017 1:41:33 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 90

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
No mulligan, no discovery. I used only the settings, that's all 😊
ATM i don't have time for tweaking on the bot, I'll post new updates when I can.. 😰



omgfrost;45154 wrote:
Awesome! Would you mind sharing the mulligan also since the most updated one is before karazhan here? :D
Also how is it going with the Reno Deck?

1 user thanked DarkFennec for this useful post.
omgfrost on 1/17/2017(UTC)
TheRandomOne
#2260 Posted : Tuesday, January 17, 2017 9:12:29 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 31

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 16 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Dre;45101 wrote:
Unfortunally I didnt have as much time to improve the deck iam working on as i hoped today, but since it got me rank 5 in 2 nights, iam going to post it anyway and then make changes later this week and update the files.

I know scott also made a jade-aggro-shaman. Thanks allot for your work scott. I wanted to make the deck not because I think I can dio better. But just because it's simply the best deck atm. The files I made now are a basis for me. I will develop these files further by checking every single log and fix things. I didnt open scott's files so i have no idea if its a simulair deck or files. This is just my version.

https://dl.dropboxuserco...Jade%20shaman%20MSG.zip

Please report any weird plays. I will also awser questions in discord when iam there.


i've been playing for a little while with your deck and its currently running under 50% although these winrates might not be entirely accurate as ive been running hearthstone deck tracker with the deck and noticed the win tracker with the bot didnt pick up all the games. But the % are a similiar value anyway (within 1%) so i doubt it matters.

otkpotato
#2261 Posted : Tuesday, January 17, 2017 9:53:23 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 253
Location: UK

Thanks: 32 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 57 post(s)
TheRandomOne;45160 wrote:
i've been playing for a little while with your deck and its currently running under 50% although these winrates might not be entirely accurate as ive been running hearthstone deck tracker with the deck and noticed the win tracker with the bot didnt pick up all the games. But the % are a similiar value anyway (within 1%) so i doubt it matters.




i dont think its the deck. all 3 of my accounts had sub 50% win rate past 2 days and i cant figure out why either. they all had very different deckllists too.
jiajie
#2280 Posted : Tuesday, January 17, 2017 10:54:43 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 10

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)


can confirm jade shaman not really doing that well...
gaetno2
#2281 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 2:15:14 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 16

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 8 post(s)
NA server
Rank 5
Deck: Pirate Aggro Warrior Wild - scottbreak

stats


ty very much
1 user thanked gaetno2 for this useful post.
scottbreak on 1/18/2017(UTC)
Dre
#2282 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:32:19 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
Will keep improving the jade agro shaman guys, atm it will reach rank 5 for sure like in the 25th till 30th. But ofc it should do better before that. the difference between 47% and 51% is not big though. Also 47% can climb. But its strange since i got to rank 5 in 2 days with like 65 en 55% wr. then i ran it the day after with 51,3 wr and got rank 4.

Again, i'll keep searching for misplays and fixes. This is a "new" project and not as refined as my midrange shaman and hunter were.
1 user thanked Dre for this useful post.
scottbreak on 1/18/2017(UTC)
aiyanjoe
#2283 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:43:14 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 32
Location: California

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Dre;45167 wrote:
Will keep improving the jade agro shaman guys, atm it will reach rank 5 for sure like in the 25th till 30th. But ofc it should do better before that. the difference between 47% and 51% is not big though. Also 47% can climb. But its strange since i got to rank 5 in 2 days with like 65 en 55% wr. then i ran it the day after with 51,3 wr and got rank 4.

Again, i'll keep searching for misplays and fixes. This is a "new" project and not as refined as my midrange shaman and hunter were.



I test your new jade agro shaman too, it doesnt work well, jump from 9 to 15 (61win 84lose)

I am in US serve, maybe the different serve has different environment.
mary7
#2289 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:55:51 AM(UTC)
mary7


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 175

Thanks: 206 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 70 post(s)
http://i.imgur.com/4KWRWI4.png
14-9 rank
concedeOnBadBoard
Dre
#2284 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:59:23 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
aiyanjoe;45168 wrote:
I test your new jade agro shaman too, it doesnt work well, jump from 9 to 15 (61win 84lose)

I am in US serve, maybe the different serve has different environment.


This is confusing me. I run a stable 50% at rank 4. I mean yeah it can differ a bit between times and server. But imo not as much as the difference between a stable rank 4 and a drop to rank 15.

Are you roping? My settings can be quite high for mediocre pc's
aiyanjoe
#2285 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 4:38:06 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 32
Location: California

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Dre;45170 wrote:
This is confusing me. I run a stable 50% at rank 4. I mean yeah it can differ a bit between times and server. But imo not as much as the difference between a stable rank 4 and a drop to rank 15.

Are you roping? My settings can be quite high for mediocre pc's



I have the alienware desktop. and I also set change the setting to 5000/1000.
I think maybe the environment? there are too many priest and renodeck here.

Btw, the aggro warrior by scott here is not as good as it in EU serve. ( I didnt judge anybody or any deck, I am very thankful to everyone.) I just need some luck to hit 5 this month
Dre
#2286 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 5:19:15 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
aiyanjoe;45173 wrote:
I have the alienware desktop. and I also set change the setting to 5000/1000.
I think maybe the environment? there are too many priest and renodeck here.

Btw, the aggro warrior by scott here is not as good as it in EU serve. ( I didnt judge anybody or any deck, I am very thankful to everyone.) I just need some luck to hit 5 this month


Alienware should be more then suficient - still strange.

Yeah ofc priest and reno is a big problem for all aggro-decks. Even when playing manual. My try my midrange shaman? It's a bit outdated but still got atleast 3 people to legendary this month.
otkpotato
#2290 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:17:01 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 253
Location: UK

Thanks: 32 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 57 post(s)
i honestly think its luck of the match up. like TS calls it the scissors paper stone meta.
i can be 56% win rate over 70 games and be 46% win rate the next 70 games the very next day at the same rank with the exact same deck. im not confident in hitting rank 5 this season on all 3 accts if this ping pong continues.
Marker689
#2291 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:56:02 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 4 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Just got 5 rank with Standard Midrange Shaman by Dre.
Thx.
1 user thanked Marker689 for this useful post.
sepefeets on 1/18/2017(UTC)
reems
#2292 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:04:42 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 12

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 4 post(s)
I reached rank 5 with dre's standard midrage shamy After arround 1000 minutes(rank 18 to 5) yesterday. After yoyoing a bit between 5 and 7 IT still had 57 percent winrate
2 users thanked reems for this useful post.
Dre on 1/18/2017(UTC), sepefeets on 1/18/2017(UTC)
scottbreak
#2301 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:29:03 AM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
From watching who is hitting Rank 5 with my Wild Pirate Warrior, it seems like EU is having an easier time. A bunch of folks hit Rank 5 before I did with win rates over 50% on EU. I'm on NA, and still hit Rank 5, but with a win rate closer to 48%. I think maybe there are just more control matchups on NA right now.
mrgodai
#2293 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:50:23 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 224
Location: FL

Thanks: 62 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 41 post(s)
reems;45186 wrote:
I reached rank 5 with dre's standard midrage shamy After arround 1000 minutes(rank 18 to 5) yesterday. After yoyoing a bit between 5 and 7 IT still had 57 percent winrate


Marker689;45185 wrote:
Just got 5 rank with Standard Midrange Shaman by Dre.
Thx.



which version? current one with Jinyu or the older version?
charis2324
#2295 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:56:25 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 76
Location: Hong Kong

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 20 post(s)
mrgodai;45188 wrote:
which version? current one with Jinyu or the older version?

I got rank 5 with the devolve version.
170 Pages«<111112113114115>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.213 seconds.