deserius;20376 wrote:Well first of all good job on your work,
I compared your bot with some others on same decks, sadly this bot performance worse than them, but i still like your work.
%=winrate
deck | Hearthranger | Hearthbuddy | Hearthcrawler |
______________________________________________
Priest --|----53%-----|----66%----|----61%----|
Warlock |----48%----|----64%----|----57%----|
Hunter--|----44%----|----59%----|----52%----|
Can you tell me when did you test with Hearthranger? Since after Hearthcrawler shut down we made some important improvements.
I believe the core logic of all the bots are almost the same, because computer only can play like that way.
Hearthranger trades some performance with 99% mouse simulation based actions, and it makes it the only one bot which can play the same way as you play by your own mouse. From opponent's view, it's almost the same as human playing.
If you can construct your own deck rules in Hearthranger, I believe the performance can be better.