Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

68 Pages«<1819202122>»
scottbreak's Meta Decks for Vision AI
lepatrice
#401 Posted : Saturday, May 27, 2017 11:06:20 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 1

I don't see how you get rank 5 or even rank 4 with the Paladin aggro build. The bot played 144 games with that build and had a winrate of 48.61%.
scottbreak
#402 Posted : Saturday, May 27, 2017 12:00:33 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
lepatrice;49618 wrote:
I don't see how you get rank 5 or even rank 4 with the Paladin aggro build. The bot played 144 games with that build and had a winrate of 48.61%.

48% win-rate is good enough to hit Rank 5. You can look back on the Project 5 thread, and see plenty of people hitting Rank 5 with a sub 50% win-rate. I was hitting Rank 5 in the first 4-5 days of the season with a sub 50% win-rate. Here is an example, and here is another; there are plenty more if you look. I don't have the time to search through threads to keep proving I'm telling the truth. Like I have said before, if you don't believe me, don't download the files.
1 user thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
brewmasterbruns on 5/28/2017(UTC)
niz
#403 Posted : Saturday, May 27, 2017 12:38:21 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
scottbreak;49619 wrote:
48% win-rate is good enough to hit Rank 5. You can look back on the Project 5 thread, and see plenty of people hitting Rank 5 with a sub 50% win-rate. I was hitting Rank 5 in the first 4-5 days of the season with a sub 50% win-rate. Here is an example, and here is another; there are plenty more if you look. I don't have the time to search through threads to keep proving I'm telling the truth. Like I have said before, if you don't believe me, don't download the files.


scott how can we improve the taunt, secrets and megasaur choices? i think if we can improve that the deck will have a better win rate
twilightsparkele
#406 Posted : Saturday, May 27, 2017 3:34:31 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 75

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 16 post(s)
Is it possible to post the amount of games played by the bot or is it too clustered?
NiPigeon
#407 Posted : Saturday, May 27, 2017 3:53:33 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4

Thanks: 2 times
Im really thankful for ur effort, but im only loosing with that Control Mage Deck :( I won 3 games in the last 2 hours.. am i making something wrong or is this normal? Btw the bot is not using arcane intellect i had 3 mana left and he just skipped the turn ;)!
twilightsparkele
#408 Posted : Saturday, May 27, 2017 4:00:57 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 75

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 16 post(s)
NiPigeon;49625 wrote:
Im really thankful for ur effort, but im only loosing with that Control Mage Deck :( I won 3 games in the last 2 hours.. am i making something wrong or is this normal? Btw the bot is not using arcane intellect i had 3 mana left and he just skipped the turn ;)!


cards likes blizzard, arcane intellect and flamestrike aren't used very often by the bot. its weird.
1 user thanked twilightsparkele for this useful post.
NiPigeon on 5/27/2017(UTC)
Hellscreamgold
#393 Posted : Saturday, May 27, 2017 5:28:35 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 99

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 13 post(s)
niz;49605 wrote:
Which deck is making in rank 5 easier, Midrange paladin or aggro paladin?

Either would do it. I got down to r4 with aggro paladin.
Hellscreamgold
#409 Posted : Saturday, May 27, 2017 8:25:23 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 99

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Secret mage never plays primordial glyph. much less tries to correctly play whatever spell is discovered if you manually play it.
scottbreak
#404 Posted : Sunday, May 28, 2017 12:11:28 AM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
niz;49622 wrote:
scott how can we improve the taunt, secrets and megasaur choices? i think if we can improve that the deck will have a better win rate

These are issues that need to be fixed by Joy and the HR team. He told me they are working on better adapt choices in the upcoming release. Please post misplays through the debug tool to hasten the improvement time. This also goes for the Mage issues; Joy told me they are improving on all spell interactions in the upcoming release. Again, submit misplays through the debug tool. If you see the bot holding a card, and not playing it when it obviously should, defiantly submit that. Thanks for all the feedback guys. Be patient, and Joy and the HR team will have Vision AI kicking ass in no time. Cheers!
brewmasterbruns
#405 Posted : Sunday, May 28, 2017 4:19:55 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 30

Thanks: 20 times
Was thanked: 16 time(s) in 10 post(s)
scottbreak;49634 wrote:
Be patient, and Joy and the HR team will have Vision AI kicking ass in no time. Cheers!

Remember a month ago when everyone was freaking out saying Vision AI sucked and would never be anywhere close to silverfish? That was a whopping one month. In one month we went from pirate warrior to midrange and aggro pally with the bot both hitting rank 5. Ridiculous to think what it'll be doing by the time the next expansion comes out.
2 users thanked brewmasterbruns for this useful post.
scottbreak on 5/28/2017(UTC), Silversurfer3456 on 5/28/2017(UTC)
jquema1
#394 Posted : Sunday, May 28, 2017 4:32:25 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 60

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
Hellscreamgold;49630 wrote:
Either would do it. I got down to r4 with aggro paladin.

Not the case for me. I have been using both but unable to get to rank 5. It will climb to 8 or 9 then sink back to 10.

Any suggestions? I'm in ASIA server btw.
scottbreak
#397 Posted : Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:26:32 AM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
jquema1;49636 wrote:
Not the case for me. I have been using both but unable to get to rank 5. It will climb to 8 or 9 then sink back to 10.

Any suggestions? I'm in ASIA server btw.

Try running at a different time of day.
1 user thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
jquema1 on 5/29/2017(UTC)
Hellscreamgold
#395 Posted : Sunday, May 28, 2017 9:36:42 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 99

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 13 post(s)
jquema1;49636 wrote:
Not the case for me. I have been using both but unable to get to rank 5. It will climb to 8 or 9 then sink back to 10.

Any suggestions? I'm in ASIA server btw.


i did most of the botting after midnight until 2pm or so. lower skilled players i found.
Hellscreamgold
#396 Posted : Sunday, May 28, 2017 3:06:18 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 99

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Hellscreamgold;49640 wrote:
i did most of the botting after midnight until 2pm or so. lower skilled players i found.

also, my play was on NA servers
spyscouter
#410 Posted : Monday, May 29, 2017 4:27:30 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Scottbreak could you work on making a farming deck for every class so that we can farm portraits at rank 20? For instance all mech classes are rather easy to bot with, but I wouldn't know where to start. Mech rogue?
scottbreak
#411 Posted : Monday, May 29, 2017 5:54:14 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
spyscouter;49668 wrote:
Scottbreak could you work on making a farming deck for every class so that we can farm portraits at rank 20? For instance all mech classes are rather easy to bot with, but I wouldn't know where to start. Mech rogue?

Sounds like a good idea; why don't you get to work on that...
2 users thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
Hellscreamgold on 5/29/2017(UTC), NightlyKnight on 5/29/2017(UTC)
jquema1
#398 Posted : Monday, May 29, 2017 11:38:05 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 60

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
scottbreak;49639 wrote:
Try running at a different time of day.

Finally rank 5 with Mid Range paladin.
1 user thanked jquema1 for this useful post.
scottbreak on 5/30/2017(UTC)
Kanoon.80
#413 Posted : Tuesday, May 30, 2017 6:58:28 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Big pirate warrior arrived at rank 5. thanks scott
1 user thanked Kanoon.80 for this useful post.
scottbreak on 5/30/2017(UTC)
Kraker01
#412 Posted : Tuesday, May 30, 2017 7:26:08 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 102

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 10 post(s)
spyscouter;49668 wrote:
Scottbreak could you work on making a farming deck for every class so that we can farm portraits at rank 20? For instance all mech classes are rather easy to bot with, but I wouldn't know where to start. Mech rogue?


I amore farming with a only basic card deck for priest, with out configs and I am reaching 30/8 win/loss

No need to waste time on such configs imho
scottbreak
#399 Posted : Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:22:32 AM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
jquema1;49674 wrote:
Finally rank 5 with Mid Range paladin.

Can you please post stats
68 Pages«<1819202122>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.157 seconds.