Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
170 Pages«<56789>»
Project Rank 5
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
sepefeets
#140 Posted : Monday, July 4, 2016 2:26:00 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
Warrior decks will likely need lots of bugs fixed since they have traditionally been more complicated and ignored for botting. Just post all the misplays in my silverfish thread (not here!) and we can try to make it viable.
Back to top
WWW
jsmwood729
#139 Posted : Monday, July 4, 2016 10:54:10 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 12

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 6 post(s)
jimbob70;39297 wrote:
JSMwood729, I think it may be better to switch settings from "rush" to "control", I saw bot will leave dangerous minions on board and attack face, I think with control maybe it will clear these minions instead. (for example a 7/3 darkshire councilman was left up that did a lot of damage next turn)

Thanks, I'll try that next.

scottbreak;39300 wrote:
Also the _discovery.txt is for shaman; you need to change it to warrior.


I'll change that and update it, thanks .
Back to top
WWW
jsmwood729
#136 Posted : Monday, July 4, 2016 11:56:44 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 12

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 6 post(s)
jimbob70;39294 wrote:
Actaully the worst misplay is when it coins out fairy dragon while it has alextraza's champion in hand, so the alex champ doesnt get the buff. Anyone know how to fix this??


I made a _combo.txt that helps but the bot doesn't attack with Alexstrasza's Champion if behave = control, but it seems to work fine with behave = rush. I don't know if you can only make the combo work if you have a dragon in hand, but it helps. I guess it'll have to be reported to sepefeets' silverfish thread.

here you go:
Back to top
WWW
etronpoilu
#98 Posted : Tuesday, July 5, 2016 1:34:45 AM(UTC)
etronpoilu

Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 26
Location: Can

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 11 post(s)
Why isn't this stickied yet ? This is awesome work ... Although great, this should replace the Project nextgen sticky ...
56% with FingerSkater midrange Hunter for 30 wins with 121.4SE. Will continue to test !

sadpwner;39199 wrote:
I am amiss writing an extremely detailed mulligan file for midrange hunter. I am halfway done currently. I'll post it when I am done.

It will feature this list

http://hss.io/d/11913152

Normally, I'll run tracking but I don't think the bot can play it well.


Can't wait to look at your work !
Back to top
WWW
Cloud
#99 Posted : Tuesday, July 5, 2016 2:36:26 AM(UTC)
Cloud


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 332
Man
Location: Germany

Thanks: 29 times
Was thanked: 60 time(s) in 45 post(s)
etronpoilu;39327 wrote:
Why isn't this stickied yet ? This is awesome work ... Although great, this should replace the Project nextgen sticky ...
56% with FingerSkater midrange Hunter for 30 wins with 121.4SE. Will continue to test !


The Project Next Gen thread was much more clear to find decklist with corresponding .txts.

If I just want to try the mentoined AggroShaman in the gifthub, I find the .txts but not the decklist. So not very useful :(
Back to top
WWW
sepefeets
#100 Posted : Tuesday, July 5, 2016 4:49:42 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
Cloud;39328 wrote:
The Project Next Gen thread was much more clear to find decklist with corresponding .txts.

If I just want to try the mentoined AggroShaman in the gifthub, I find the .txts but not the decklist. So not very useful :(

Yell at Dre about that, he put the list in the mulligan.
Back to top
WWW
Dre
#101 Posted : Wednesday, July 6, 2016 4:30:22 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
sepefeets;39330 wrote:
Yell at Dre about that, he put the list in the mulligan.


I will make a seperate txt with the decklist next time, it's in the mulligan for that deck now
Back to top
WWW
sadpwner
#141 Posted : Wednesday, July 6, 2016 1:05:20 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 262
Location: somewhere

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 64 time(s) in 54 post(s)
btw, there's a nice chart of matchup winrates here
http://www.vicioussyndic...hart-data-reaper-report/
Back to top
WWW
shinryu
#142 Posted : Thursday, July 7, 2016 6:54:44 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4
Hello, sorry for my question but how im supossed to be 100% sure i installed every fine? :p
Did i need change the DeckRuleFile and AI or just every default? ^^ thank :p
cause actually i guess my installation it's 100% fucked.. :/

i actually us wings of wax budget not adventure.

Like someone can upload me the folder hearthranger from the actual deck please? thank you
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
Dre
#143 Posted : Thursday, July 7, 2016 12:31:09 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
Today i went over about 70 plays of Dark pebbler for my ZooLock I did a first test with yday. I must say the minions are pretty well chosen, so i didnt want to have to much data in the discovery file. So let it think on its own i.e. picking a Bloodsail Corsair when the oponent has a weapon. Anyway here are my discover rules. With these rules it picked the right 1-drop for all 70 uses. (that is in my opinion)

Code:

// This File: _discovery.txt
// Author: Dre
// Version: 0.2 (07-Jul-16)
// Deck Name: Zoolock
// Hero: Warlock
// Deck Type: Zoo (Control)

//Power Overwhelming
EX1_316,100;warlock;all

//Soulfire
EX1_308,80;warlock;all

//Abusive Sergeant
CS2_188,60;all;all

// Possessed Villager
OG_241,40;all;all

// voidwalker
CS2_065,30;all;all

// Corruption
CS2_063,20;all;all

// Mortal coil
EX1_302,10;all;all
Back to top
WWW
sadpwner
#144 Posted : Thursday, July 7, 2016 4:12:21 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 262
Location: somewhere

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 64 time(s) in 54 post(s)
Is there any way to devalue finley for discover? It's keeps picking the card.
Back to top
WWW
sepefeets
#145 Posted : Thursday, July 7, 2016 6:52:14 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
sadpwner;39412 wrote:
Is there any way to devalue finley for discover? It's keeps picking the card.

Only if you put everything into the discovery. Improving discovery is my next big project...
Back to top
WWW
Dre
#146 Posted : Thursday, July 7, 2016 7:02:26 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
sepefeets;39421 wrote:
Only if you put everything into the discovery. Improving discovery is my next big project...


In 70 dark pebblers it dient pick Finley once...but maybe I was lucky. I have a list of all the one drops and priority but I didn't want to post them all in the file because the bot was picking them fine after this modifications all ready....in my experience that is.
Back to top
WWW
sadpwner
#147 Posted : Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:24:49 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 262
Location: somewhere

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 64 time(s) in 54 post(s)
btw, I realised that you should set the mouse speed to max in the bot control in hearthranger. The default settings takes 3 seconds longer for every move, so you could save up to 20 seconds with a big board preventing a rope out. This means you can further increase the # of calculations.
Back to top
WWW
spyscouter
#148 Posted : Friday, July 8, 2016 12:20:47 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 118

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 29 time(s) in 17 post(s)
Hello! I have been ghosting this thread for awhile, and want to step up and start contributing. Are there any decks that need testing? How else can I contribute to the cause?

-Josh
Back to top
WWW
sepefeets
#109 Posted : Saturday, July 9, 2016 12:27:15 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
sepefeets;39220 wrote:
What are your opinions on how to handle various settings for similar decks? Should I just keep them separate in different folders? Should I merge them together?

When they are extremely similar and it's obvious that the old files ought to have the new settings then my intuition is to merge them but when there are things that look questionable then I lean towards keeping it separate.

I'm thinking maybe have a base set that is designed to support most variations and then separate folders for each of your specific variations?

So nobody ever responded about this and I'm going with the base set supporting most combinations + separate folders for each of your variations.

I added scottbreak's zoo settings, fixed all the errors with card id's in scottbreak's/Dre's mulligans (keep in mind this changes the behavior for better or worse!), and deleted Blackoak's old Default rules (if you really want them you can still get them from the repo history).

Any news on how that warrior deck is doing?
Back to top
WWW
Dre
#117 Posted : Saturday, July 9, 2016 3:56:18 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
sepefeets;39462 wrote:
So nobody ever responded about this and I'm going with the base set supporting most combinations + separate folders for each of your variations.

I added scottbreak's zoo settings, fixed all the errors with card id's in scottbreak's/Dre's mulligans (keep in mind this changes the behavior for better or worse!), and deleted Blackoak's old Default rules (if you really want them you can still get them from the repo history).

Any news on how that warrior deck is doing?


Missed the question about the settings before but i think its fine as you described.

Can you give an example what was wrong with card id's in my mulligan?
Back to top
WWW
sepefeets
#149 Posted : Saturday, July 9, 2016 4:17:15 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
It's in the changelog or if you just run it through the new SF but you had LEX1_008 instead of EX1_008. You also have some capitalized "Shaman" in the class which was invalid before but now it gets automatically converted to all lowercase. SF will warn about most mistakes in mulligan rules now.
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked sepefeets for this useful post.
Dre on 7/9/2016(UTC)
godshades
#150 Posted : Saturday, July 9, 2016 2:09:09 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 81

Thanks: 20 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Back to top
WWW
sepefeets
#151 Posted : Saturday, July 9, 2016 6:00:04 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
Added scottbreak's midrange shaman files (most of it was already merged into the base files).
Back to top
WWW
170 Pages«<56789>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.260 seconds.