Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

170 Pages<12345>»
Project Rank 5
dohh
#43 Posted : Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:36:33 PM(UTC)
dohh


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 54
Location: brasil

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 8 post(s)
civi;38918 wrote:
Started rank 20 , now i'm rank 6 with not even 2h / day on 2 weeks .

I'm using an alternate version of the Wild Secret Paladin.
It appears the bot did not do very well with some cards so i replaced them with other more "against the meta" .


can u show your deck?
scottbreak
#41 Posted : Wednesday, June 22, 2016 6:22:48 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
MarinoBog;38908 wrote:
Sooooooo, have anybody made it to rank 5 or lower in standard mode this season, and wich deck was it from this Data file/list?


I posted a Rank 5 deck earlier today; here is the link to the thread.
Standard Midrange Shaman Deck - Rank 5
1 user thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
ptx on 6/25/2016(UTC)
sepefeets
#48 Posted : Wednesday, June 22, 2016 8:35:11 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
I updated the midrange shaman files with scottbreak's decklist, the latest meta snapshot decklist, and updated mulligan based on meta snapshot recommendations.

ps. scottbreak in your mulligan you have "paladin" instead of "pala" and "theif" instead of "thief".
scottbreak
#49 Posted : Wednesday, June 22, 2016 9:23:41 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
sepefeets;38927 wrote:
I updated the midrange shaman files with scottbreak's decklist, the latest meta snapshot decklist, and updated mulligan based on meta snapshot recommendations.

ps. scottbreak in your mulligan you have "paladin" instead of "pala" and "theif" instead of "thief".

Oop! Thanks, I'll fix that.
scottbreak
#50 Posted : Wednesday, June 22, 2016 9:45:09 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
Below are the _combo.txt, _mulligan.txt (fixed)/settings.txt for my Midrange Shaman that hit Rank 5 this season.
The deck list is in _mulligan.txt

@Dre: I have created a _combo.txt, _mulligan.txt and settings.txt for Trumps Zoolock 1.4 you were talking about. I have been running it on unranked for about an hour, and have a WR of 87% (7-1). I know that is way to small a sample size, but it's giving me hope. I still need to work on the discovery.txt, and will give more updates as I continue to test.

@sepefeets: To create the discovery.txt for Zoolock/Dark Peddler, do I have to assign a value to every Warlock and Neutral 1-Drop?

_combo.txt


_mulligan.txt


settings.txt
sepefeets
#51 Posted : Wednesday, June 22, 2016 10:07:29 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
You don't need to have every card but you should include every card that could potentially give lethal (spells and charge minions) because currently if it finds any match from _discovery.txt then it will use the highest valued card from _discovery.txt without doing any checks for lethal. I would really avoid using it for anything other than the sir finley priorities right now though. When I integrate it into the board value system properly then it will be able to ignore your priorities if something gives lethal but right now it can't.


Is it just me or does it seem like midnight to noon is bad for climbing now? There seems to be way too few people at these hours now and I've seen it matching rank 9 vs legendary players.
scottbreak
#52 Posted : Wednesday, June 22, 2016 10:43:27 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
sepefeets;38931 wrote:
You don't need to have every card but you should include every card that could potentially give lethal (spells and charge minions) because currently if it finds any match from _discovery.txt then it will use the highest valued card from _discovery.txt without doing any checks for lethal. I would really avoid using it for anything other than the sir finley priorities right now though. When I integrate it into the board value system properly then it will be able to ignore your priorities if something gives lethal but right now it can't.


Is it just me or does it seem like midnight to noon is bad for climbing now? There seems to be way too few people at these hours now and I've seen it matching rank 9 vs legendary players.


Thanks for the insight. I will wait on creating a _discovery.txt for Zoolock until you have it integrated then.

As for climbing, I have had pretty good success from 3am-7am EST.
dohh
#53 Posted : Wednesday, June 22, 2016 10:44:33 PM(UTC)
dohh


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 54
Location: brasil

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 8 post(s)
scott how many days did u took for reach rank 5 with shaman?
scottbreak
#54 Posted : Wednesday, June 22, 2016 11:22:38 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
dohh;38933 wrote:
scott how many days did u took for reach rank 5 with shaman?

Less than a day from Rank 15.
Dre
#55 Posted : Thursday, June 23, 2016 3:21:23 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: HSModerator, Registered
Posts: 888
Man
Location: The Netherlands

Thanks: 216 times
Was thanked: 480 time(s) in 315 post(s)
scottbreak;38923 wrote:
I can give Zoolock a shot. It is probably the more difficult of the two, but would defiantly have more success if we can get it right. For the _discovery.txt, would I have to set a 0-9 value to every Warlock and Neutral 1-drop? It would probably make sense to have a value set to each hero power as well, incase Sir Finley is chosen from a Dark Peddler, correct?


That is correct, like this:

jimbob70
#56 Posted : Thursday, June 23, 2016 6:24:19 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 21

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 6 time(s) in 6 post(s)
The midrange shaman does work, I got to rank 8 but when I got the golden hero I decided to try hunter, after a few days of hunter I got rank 6, now its going back and forth between rank 9 and rank 7, hoping for rank 5 by the end of season.

For the Midrange-Hunter, I didnt have all the cards for any of the hunter decks posted on the thread ( I missing Nzoth, doomsayers, azure drakes, stampeding kodo, and I only have 1 call of the wild), so I tried to make something similar, its almost like the "traps" deck, but with -1x call of the wild, -1x knife juggler, -2x Azure Drakes, -1x snake trap, +1 tundra Rhino, +1 Ram wrangler, +1 deadly shot, +1 unleash the hounds, +1 carrion grub)

Anyone else have any luck with the hunter decks?

should I go for Nzoth or you think I should get the drakes and do the full traps deck?



sepefeets
#57 Posted : Thursday, June 23, 2016 6:47:18 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
The drakes were just fillers because the expansion had just launched and there wasn't a defined meta yet and the n'zoth/doomsayer variations have fallen out of meta too.

This list has become fairly stable: https://tempostorm.com/h...a-snapshot-june-19-2016

There's also the desert camel variation but IMO it's terrible outside of tournaments because you don't want to summon free 1 drops for zoo/shaman/hunter/etc.
civi
#44 Posted : Thursday, June 23, 2016 2:23:04 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2

dohh;38919 wrote:
can u show your deck?


Actually Rank 4 with this deck ( +tirion and n'zoth)

scottbreak
#45 Posted : Thursday, June 23, 2016 11:36:48 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
civi;38964 wrote:
Actually Rank 4 with this deck ( +tirion and n'zoth)



I've been testing this deck with combo/mulligan/settings I wrote quickly for it. The bot doesn't seem to be using Eater of Secrets correctly. It attacked into a Secret Paladin with a full xmas tree of secrets, instead of just dropping the Eater of Secrets. Was it acting differently for you?
unkewl
#58 Posted : Thursday, June 23, 2016 11:59:49 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 3

hi, i don't have some cards for your midrange shaman deck,
i'm thinking of using faceless manipulator to get the thunderbluff valiant (i only have 1 of it).
how do i do the combo settings for this?
sepefeets
#46 Posted : Friday, June 24, 2016 12:00:12 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 899

Thanks: 1028 times
Was thanked: 584 time(s) in 238 post(s)
scottbreak;38971 wrote:
I've been testing this deck with combo/mulligan/settings I wrote quickly for it. The bot doesn't seem to be using Eater of Secrets correctly. It attacked into a Secret Paladin with a full xmas tree of secrets, instead of just dropping the Eater of Secrets. Was it acting differently for you?

Be sure to get me that board. ;)
scottbreak
#47 Posted : Friday, June 24, 2016 12:20:33 AM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
sepefeets;38974 wrote:
Be sure to get me that board. ;)

Pretty sure it's this one...
http://pastebin.com/kYQLu5Zt
anczej
#59 Posted : Friday, June 24, 2016 1:46:11 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 27

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 4 post(s)
Scott, I have reached rank 16 from 7 with ur deck and mulligans lol... what im doing wrong.

At first it was doing pretty well, but during night it has 27% winrate.
scottbreak
#60 Posted : Friday, June 24, 2016 6:11:13 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
anczej;38991 wrote:
Scott, I have reached rank 16 from 7 with ur deck and mulligans lol... what im doing wrong.

At first it was doing pretty well, but during night it has 27% winrate.


Don't know for sure. Are you possibly roping?
anczej
#62 Posted : Friday, June 24, 2016 6:12:45 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 27

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 4 post(s)
What do you mean?
170 Pages<12345>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.221 seconds.