alabatusa;37968 wrote:Thanks psychotic94?
Good to see your getting much better results than i was. Can you clarify if you got them in ranked or casual? Assuming its ranked, since you said 200 wins. It got me my gold paly in 3 days.
I wonder if you got better results due to using silverfish.
Im using a zoo now, while slower is still getting 65% win rate using zoo deck rules.
Hey, alabatusa. To answer your first question, if I can direct your attention to the second paragraph of my first post, I stated that I have been running the bot on the Auto Concede option at Rank 20 and 1 star, so yes I am indeed playing in Ranked mode.
I also believe the updated version of Silverfish has greatly influenced the win/loss ratio. Since the update, I have seen much fewer errors. Mind you, I have only tested the Divine Aggro Paladin deck previously mentioned, so I can only attest to that one deck's performance in this current meta.
Update: Here are my current
results. For a side by side comparison, here were my previous
results.
As you can see, my overall statistics have remained consistent keeping the same cards, deck rules, and version of Silverfish. After botting for an additional ~13 hours, there has been a slight decrease in wins. This is true across all classes with the greatest difference in games against the Rogue at -11.8% (I went from 100.0% win/loss to 88.2%). This may be due to the new Miracle Rogue that has sprung up in the current meta, but I do not have enough data to confirm this. Still, dropping to 88.2% wins is not enough to convince me that I should add an Auto Concede option to blacklist Rogues. My reasoning for this is that there are simply not enough games played against Rogues to determine if this drop in wins is due to a trend or just chance.
One other interesting thing to note is that I have actually increased in wins against Mages (+2.4%), Shamans (+7.2%), and Warlocks (+8.6%). All of these classes have one thing in common, which is a significant increase in games played. I went from 12 games against Mages to 35 games. Shamans went from 9 games to 20 games. Warlocks went from 7 games to 15 games. In all of these match ups, the amount of games have increased by more than 100%. To reiterate, I have not changed any cards, deck rules, or A.I's, so I can determine that the only reason for my increase in wins is due to the amount of games played. This implies that the current results that I have are far more reliable than what I have previously posted.
I hope that this update helps any members out there who have considered running this deck. I am proud to have contributed my input, and I am eager to see HearthRanger and its users benefit from this data.