Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
19 Pages<1234>»
[Vision AI] Ljac's Hearthranger Decks
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
fenir
#24 Posted : Tuesday, January 2, 2018 8:34:24 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 3

Thanks: 2 times
Please correct MurlocPaladinStandard mulligan.json because this is from the Druid deck. A small error :)
Back to top
WWW
thewisechineseguru
#25 Posted : Tuesday, January 2, 2018 9:04:09 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 1
The druid deck misses lethal using branching paths a lot of the time
Back to top
WWW
flawless22
#27 Posted : Tuesday, January 2, 2018 9:30:24 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 23

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Secret Hunter went 0-7. Wasn't watching it, went out to dinner. Took out the concede file and it lost another 5 games.
Back to top
WWW
Ljac
#26 Posted : Wednesday, January 3, 2018 11:12:00 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 52

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 15 post(s)
thewisechineseguru;53611 wrote:
The druid deck misses lethal using branching paths a lot of the time


Can you see if the deck does it with default Config in Debug mode as well? My config cannot force some choice when it has lethal -> bot does it automatically by giving large values to the choices (order of 10000). The card is new, so perhaps the behaviour is not well defined. Other than that, I'll fix Aggro Druid soon, as I've seen it is underperforming A LOT. If the lethal was missed in debug mode with default config, report the bug.

fenir;53610 wrote:
Please correct MurlocPaladinStandard mulligan.json because this is from the Druid deck. A small error :)

Fixed, must have overwritten it while creating Mulligans :)
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
botwhat
#28 Posted : Wednesday, January 3, 2018 12:00:47 PM(UTC)
botwhat


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 162

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 225 time(s) in 58 post(s)
Ok tested dragon priest last night and gave it a full nights run to see how it fared. currently 16-41 for a 28% win rate at rank 15.
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked botwhat for this useful post.
mary7 on 1/6/2018(UTC)
Ljac
#29 Posted : Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:18:13 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 52

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 15 post(s)
botwhat;53630 wrote:
Ok tested dragon priest last night and gave it a full nights run to see how it fared. currently 16-41 for a 28% win rate at rank 15.


Too low, will notify people not to use it. Currently testing Murloc Pally, has 70% winrate in 10 games for now. Dragon Priest results will probably come in 2 days or late tomorrow. Also, would love it if you could upload the replay files for me so I can polish it in the meantime.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
Landrik
#30 Posted : Thursday, January 4, 2018 6:06:07 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 8
Location: Kuwait
https://imgur.com/it27Y3r

I let the druid run all day yesterday and this is it. I deleted the concede file as I told you it kept conceding for no reason. I will keep you posted on further progress. This is in casual.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
Ljac
#31 Posted : Thursday, January 4, 2018 9:15:21 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 52

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 15 post(s)
Landrik;53661 wrote:
https://imgur.com/it27Y3r

I let the druid run all day yesterday and this is it. I deleted the concede file as I told you it kept conceding for no reason. I will keep you posted on further progress. This is in casual.


Casual is supposed to concede after every win. I've tested the config already and there was nothing wrong with it concede-wise.

If the bot is conceding more than after every win, check your settings.
Back to top
WWW
roxtigers
#32 Posted : Thursday, January 4, 2018 2:22:53 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 1
Ran druid over night at rank 20; ran about 120 games at a 28.65% win rate
Back to top
WWW
Ljac
#33 Posted : Thursday, January 4, 2018 7:04:17 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 52

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 15 post(s)
roxtigers;53666 wrote:
Ran druid over night at rank 20; ran about 120 games at a 28.65% win rate


Could you share details in winrates please? I'm getting 15% better winrate than that at rank 15...
Back to top
WWW
zws
#34 Posted : Friday, January 5, 2018 7:47:09 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 64
Location: pl

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 20 post(s)
Tried agro hunter at rank 15. After first 20 wins swapped hydra and one golakka for second cobalt drake + flanking strike, didn't affect winrate much.

agh
Back to top
WWW
Ljac
#35 Posted : Friday, January 5, 2018 9:25:04 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 52

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 15 post(s)
zws;53694 wrote:
Tried agro hunter at rank 15. After first 20 wins swapped hydra and one golakka for second cobalt drake + flanking strike, didn't affect winrate much.

agh


I have yet to fix its misplays (currently at Pirate Warrior last in line). Could you perhaps send me the review files so I don't have to run the bot for hunter and can fix misplays from your files?
Back to top
WWW
zws
#36 Posted : Friday, January 5, 2018 9:33:44 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 64
Location: pl

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 20 post(s)
Ljac;53697 wrote:
I have yet to fix its misplays (currently at Pirate Warrior last in line). Could you perhaps send me the review files so I don't have to run the bot for hunter and can fix misplays from your files?


Sure, aggroHunter
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked zws for this useful post.
Ljac on 1/5/2018(UTC)
Ljac
#37 Posted : Friday, January 5, 2018 10:56:24 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 52

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 15 post(s)
zws;53698 wrote:
Sure, aggroHunter


Wow, thanks man, you saved me a lot of work!
Back to top
WWW
zws
#38 Posted : Saturday, January 6, 2018 6:23:32 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 64
Location: pl

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 20 post(s)
Here is more. One misplay I noticed is it uses here power at 2 mana with golakka/razormaw in hand. Should play golakka.

hunter

### creeper2
# Class: Hunter
# Format: Standard
# Year of the Mammoth
#
# 2x (1) Alleycat
# 1x (1) Candleshot
# 2x (1) Dire Mole
# 1x (1) Patches the Pirate
# 2x (1) Southsea Deckhand
# 2x (2) Crackling Razormaw
# 2x (2) Dire Wolf Alpha
# 1x (2) Golakka Crawler
# 2x (3) Animal Companion
# 2x (3) Eaglehorn Bow
# 2x (3) Kill Command
# 2x (3) Southsea Captain
# 1x (4) Flanking Strike
# 2x (4) Houndmaster
# 1x (4) Spellbreaker
# 2x (5) Cobalt Scalebane
# 1x (5) Leeroy Jenkins
# 2x (7) Corridor Creeper
#
AAECAR8GrwTyBZG8AuTCAt3SAuHjAgyoArUDqAXUBdkH6wf+DOq7Ao7DAsrLAvvTAovlAgA=
#
# To use this deck, copy it to your clipboard and create a new deck in Hearthstone
Back to top
WWW
mary7
#42 Posted : Saturday, January 6, 2018 6:38:05 AM(UTC)
mary7


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 175

Thanks: 206 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 70 post(s)
thanks for up thread, dont know how I missed it
concedeOnBadBoard
Back to top
WWW
Ljac
#39 Posted : Saturday, January 6, 2018 10:35:48 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 52

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 15 post(s)
zws;53710 wrote:
Here is more. One misplay I noticed is it uses here power at 2 mana with golakka/razormaw in hand. Should play golakka.

hunter

### creeper2
# Class: Hunter
# Format: Standard
# Year of the Mammoth
#
# 2x (1) Alleycat
# 1x (1) Candleshot
# 2x (1) Dire Mole
# 1x (1) Patches the Pirate
# 2x (1) Southsea Deckhand
# 2x (2) Crackling Razormaw
# 2x (2) Dire Wolf Alpha
# 1x (2) Golakka Crawler
# 2x (3) Animal Companion
# 2x (3) Eaglehorn Bow
# 2x (3) Kill Command
# 2x (3) Southsea Captain
# 1x (4) Flanking Strike
# 2x (4) Houndmaster
# 1x (4) Spellbreaker
# 2x (5) Cobalt Scalebane
# 1x (5) Leeroy Jenkins
# 2x (7) Corridor Creeper
#
AAECAR8GrwTyBZG8AuTCAt3SAuHjAgyoArUDqAXUBdkH6wf+DOq7Ao7DAsrLAvvTAovlAgA=
#
# To use this deck, copy it to your clipboard and create a new deck in Hearthstone


I'll try to bypass it, but at this point it is a Hearthranger bug, so make sure you report it through the debug tool. Hearthranger is very conservative so sometimes it will enter a deadlock because it can't use its resources most efficiently (fixed something similar with Murloc Pally where the bot didn't play a Murloc turn 1 with a Rockpool Hunter in hand).
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked Ljac for this useful post.
zws on 1/6/2018(UTC)
zws
#40 Posted : Saturday, January 6, 2018 11:23:05 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 64
Location: pl

Thanks: 16 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 20 post(s)
Ljac;53713 wrote:
I'll try to bypass it, but at this point it is a Hearthranger bug, so make sure you report it through the debug tool. Hearthranger is very conservative so sometimes it will enter a deadlock because it can't use its resources most efficiently (fixed something similar with Murloc Pally where the bot didn't play a Murloc turn 1 with a Rockpool Hunter in hand).


Yea, I did report it with another one - vision evaluates southsea captain as if patches was in deck even after it's gone. It would play it over animal companion which is wrong.
Back to top
WWW
Ljac
#41 Posted : Saturday, January 6, 2018 12:34:18 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 52

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 15 post(s)
zws;53714 wrote:
Yea, I did report it with another one - vision evaluates southsea captain as if patches was in deck even after it's gone. It would play it over animal companion which is wrong.


I think if you get Patches from a Pirate it doesn't deduct it from the deck. This bug has been here for at least 2 months (when I first reported it). My bug fixes also include fixing Animal Companion because the bot seems to hate the card a lot. Had multiple times where it used hero power instead of playing it. Might be because it's a spell that doesn't have a constant effect, something that is not valued with cards like Branching Paths.

Also, the bot values Southsea Captain a lot for some reason. It will even play it over Tar Creeper in some decks when your opponent has a wide board.
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
Incredibility
#43 Posted : Saturday, January 6, 2018 2:05:02 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 20

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 9 post(s)
Hey Ljac,

I think there's a small error in NEW1_019.json in your GeneralCardSettings folder.
At line 11 you have "minionscard" instead of "minioncard"
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked Incredibility for this useful post.
Ljac on 1/6/2018(UTC)
19 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.158 seconds.