Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

68 Pages«<1112131415>»
scottbreak's Meta Decks for Vision AI
otkpotato
#249 Posted : Sunday, May 7, 2017 5:55:37 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 253
Location: UK

Thanks: 32 times
Was thanked: 70 time(s) in 57 post(s)
reems;48830 wrote:
is there any working rank 5 ladder deck?


the decks can hit rank 5. the AI cant.
flawless22
#224 Posted : Sunday, May 7, 2017 11:29:30 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 23

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Still struggling to figure out why I keep getting this message. I used the pirate warrior last month with no problems so I may have just missed a step. Not sure though. Any help would be greatly appreciated.


Unexpected character encountered while parsing value: . Path ", line 0, position 0.
Cloud
#251 Posted : Monday, May 8, 2017 4:12:52 AM(UTC)
Cloud


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 332
Man
Location: Germany

Thanks: 29 times
Was thanked: 60 time(s) in 45 post(s)
hey scottbreak, are you still working on some upgrades for the decks or even new decks?

thanks for your great work.
scottbreak
#252 Posted : Monday, May 8, 2017 9:13:49 AM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
Cloud;48842 wrote:
hey scottbreak, are you still working on some upgrades for the decks or even new decks?

thanks for your great work.

Should be updates today or tomorrow...
1 user thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
MarinoBog on 5/8/2017(UTC)
scottbreak
#253 Posted : Monday, May 8, 2017 10:36:16 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
scottbreak;48847 wrote:
Should be updates today or tomorrow...

Updated.
1 user thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
Somerandombot007 on 5/10/2017(UTC)
Hellscreamgold
#254 Posted : Tuesday, May 9, 2017 8:17:10 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 99

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Tried the new aggro paladin setup you just updated. It's currently getting WORSE results than the aggro deck using the previous midrange paladin settings. Current test was in casual play, concede if last game was a win was NOT turned on. (note - yes, I'm aware in the screen that the deck name says MidrangePaladin. I just modified the deck a few days ago to match the aggro paladin and didn't rename it)

I used the midrange paladin setup with the aggro paladin deck the previous 2 days, on the ladder, and went from rank 19 to rank 8 and an overall 63% win rate. Warriors were the only opponent that it didn't have at least 50% win rate.

Here's a screenshot of the results from the overnight casual play with aggro_paladin:

http://imgur.com/a/8cMM4
mary7
#255 Posted : Tuesday, May 9, 2017 8:32:31 AM(UTC)
mary7


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 175

Thanks: 206 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 70 post(s)
hit rank 5 with => redfish <=
concedeOnBadBoard
Hellscreamgold
#256 Posted : Tuesday, May 9, 2017 9:04:53 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 99

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 13 post(s)
mary7;48897 wrote:
hit rank 5 with => redfish <=

What deck list did you use using the redfish AI in the link you gave?
mary7
#257 Posted : Tuesday, May 9, 2017 10:05:29 AM(UTC)
mary7


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 175

Thanks: 206 times
Was thanked: 74 time(s) in 70 post(s)
that agropal same scottbreak's
=> link on posting <=
concedeOnBadBoard
bladexnl
#259 Posted : Tuesday, May 9, 2017 2:32:22 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Why exactly did you remove the token shaman deck? Its the best performing deck out of all of them for me.
I also never saw it rope out on hard turns or something like that.


Token Shaman Stats

Rank 20 concede after every game won, so actual stats are 344 - 94
In comparison, the mid hunter deck went 292 - 117
Frost22
#260 Posted : Tuesday, May 9, 2017 3:37:54 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 3

Thanks: 2 times
Decent results in ranked rank 18- -> 14 with the midrange pally.


Hampedon
#261 Posted : Tuesday, May 9, 2017 10:02:48 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 1

Thanks: 1 times
Great job, i just had a small issue with the Taunt warrior tough!

It seems like it just gave up after a while, i had plenty of playable taunts on my hand but it just gave me armor instead and then ended the turns.
Also it casted "Sleep with fishes" on 1 creature with full health, resulting in... Well no result really.

Just wanted to let you know, thanks again!
Christopho
#262 Posted : Tuesday, May 9, 2017 11:10:24 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2

Thanks: 1 times
Any chance you can do other classes as well? Most particularly trying to find a deck for golden mage farming.
ahnchan999
#258 Posted : Wednesday, May 10, 2017 3:10:46 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 47
Man

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 8 post(s)
mary7;48901 wrote:
that agropal same scottbreak's
=> link on posting <=


can you upload the files(_mulligans.txt , _combos.txt and etc)
Hellscreamgold
#263 Posted : Wednesday, May 10, 2017 7:56:33 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 99

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Here's results of using the aggro paladin deck list with the paladin_midrange setting files from before you did the latest update (on the 8th):

http://imgur.com/a/PAMiW

Over twice the games as my previous post, but the paladin_midrange set from before the update did 14%+ better - no concede on win was set - just straight up casual game farming.

I'll be trying the aggro deck with the "new" paladin_midrange set for today to see what happens....but so far, there's obviously something wrong with the aggro rules.

Thx.
jhamdw
#264 Posted : Wednesday, May 10, 2017 4:20:48 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2

Thanks: 2 times
Midhunter, casual NA, concede if hp < 5, enemy > 25.

http://imgur.com/a/i1MH1
scottbreak
#266 Posted : Thursday, May 11, 2017 10:29:37 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
Reached Rank 8 with updated Aggro Paladin
Hellscreamgold
#267 Posted : Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:02:40 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 99

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 13 post(s)
scottbreak;49108 wrote:
Reached Rank 8 with updated Aggro Paladin


Testing updated aggro paladin.

Will advise.
Hellscreamgold
#268 Posted : Friday, May 12, 2017 12:04:49 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 99

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Hellscreamgold;49111 wrote:
Testing updated aggro paladin.

Will advise.


7 games so far, 2 wins....



going to let it run overnight and see what it comes out with in the morning
Hellscreamgold
#279 Posted : Friday, May 12, 2017 7:42:55 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 99

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 21 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Current from overnight (including concessions since HR isn't playing casual with concede on win)

68 Pages«<1112131415>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.430 seconds.