Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
68 Pages«<34567>»
scottbreak's Meta Decks for Vision AI
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
sleakleak
#85 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:49:14 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9
Location: utah

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
I know this is not what it's intended for but I thought I'd give hunter a go a climbing in standard. Rank 16->15

http://imgur.com/a/B1qt2
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
jquema1
#86 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:59:05 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 60

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 5 post(s)
scottbreak;48122 wrote:
scottbreak's Meta Decks for Vision AI


I am going to use this thread to post all of the files I create for Vision AI meta decks. I will update as often as possible, but as I have said previously, I am currently only running one account. That is where y'all come in. If you are going to use these files, I ask that you post your results and suggestions here, and report any misplays through Debug Tool.

Goals for the Deck's: My goals for these decks are to grind daily quests and gold as quickly as possible. I will be testing them in Casual Mode with auto-concede if won last game. However, I believe they will be viable for both grinding golden heroes, and climbing the ladder to some extent. Again, this is where your help is needed. Players that are interested in running the files in Ranked Mode are encouraged to share results and suggestions, and report any misplays through the Debug Tool. This is the only way we are going to improve the play.

Decks: I am currently working on Pirate Warrior for a few reasons. In my opinion, it is still the strongest deck in the meta, and for the bot. The version I am using does not have any new cards or discovery, which makes the results much more consistent and easier to write. I plan on also creating files for Taunt Warrior, Zoolock, Midrange Hunter, Midrange Paladin and possibly Dragon Priest and Aggro Druid. I will start with a Mulligan.json for each, and add additional files depending on my time, results and community response.

*Please refer to Joy's Vision AI Help Index for how to setup these files.
*Updates
4/20/2017:
Added links to files instead of posting
4/19/2017:
Removed adapt files - bot has been optimized to make best selection
Aggro Druid: files added - please test and post results
Midrange Hunter: files added - please test and post results
Taunt Warrior: files added, UNG_072.json fixed and results posted
Pirate Warrior: files updated, Ravasaur Runt added to mulligan as an option and UNG_009.json added

Pirate Warrior
Current win rate: 73%
Download

Taunt Warrior
Current win rate: 78%
Download

Midrange Hunter
Current win rate: 75%
Download

Aggro Druid
Current win rate: 70%
Download


Noticed a miss play. On the 6th turn the bot played Bloodsail Raider then Fiery War Axe. So I'm assuming its the default in vision AI.
Back to top
WWW
sleakleak
#88 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 3:05:06 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 9
Location: utah

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
The data on the latest data reaper report suggests that midrange hunter should be able to climb to MUCH higher than it is currently climbing. Vision seems to make a ton of misplays still.
Back to top
WWW
scottbreak
#87 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 3:10:02 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
jquema1;48297 wrote:
Noticed a miss play. On the 6th turn the bot played Bloodsail Raider then Fiery War Axe. So I'm assuming its the default in vision AI.

Did you report the midplay through Hearthrangers Debug Tool?
Back to top
WWW
scottbreak
#89 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 3:11:07 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
sleakleak;48298 wrote:
The data on the latest data reaper report suggests that midrange hunter should be able to climb to MUCH higher than it is currently climbing. Vision seems to make a ton of misplays still.

There are defiantly misplays in all the decks. That is why I masking the community to report the misplays. This will allow Joy and his team to refine the boys play.
Back to top
WWW
DarkFennec
#90 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 4:32:35 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 90

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 18 time(s) in 17 post(s)
i'm reporting all the bugs i found, but i can't select the card because it was not on the default ini.

i've added a note in the window.



scottbreak;48301 wrote:
There are defiantly misplays in all the decks. That is why I masking the community to report the misplays. This will allow Joy and his team to refine the boys play.

Back to top
WWW
scottbreak
#91 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 5:53:28 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
I just added Midrange Paladin and Murloc Paladin, and I am currently testing.

*Update: fixed UNG_011.json
Back to top
WWW
 |  Edit by user
1 user thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
mokuton on 4/20/2017(UTC)
Juebar
#92 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 6:18:44 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 58

Thanks: 18 times
Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Hi.
Sorry if this is off toppic.
I tried to get this files running. So I put them int the Directory Hearthranger\Decklibrary\sb_warrior_taunt-v.01\ for example
And named the deck in game "sb_warrior_taunt-v.01" to make sure the bot knows which files to use.

Are these settings correct ?

Thanks scottbreak for the great work, mate !
Back to top
WWW
scottbreak
#94 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 6:26:46 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
Juebar;48310 wrote:
Hi.
Sorry if this is off toppic.
I tried to get this files running. So I put them int the Directory Hearthranger\Decklibrary\sb_warrior_taunt-v.01\ for example
And named the deck in game "sb_warrior_taunt-v.01" to make sure the bot knows which files to use.

Are these settings correct ?

Thanks scottbreak for the great work, mate !


http://www.hearthranger....sionai/VisionAI_Help.htm
Back to top
WWW
NightlyKnight
#93 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 6:32:12 PM(UTC)
NightlyKnight


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 44
Man
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

Thanks: 19 times
Was thanked: 53 time(s) in 13 post(s)
Juebar;48310 wrote:
Hi.
Sorry if this is off toppic.
I tried to get this files running. So I put them int the Directory Hearthranger\Decklibrary\sb_warrior_taunt-v.01\ for example
And named the deck in game "sb_warrior_taunt-v.01" to make sure the bot knows which files to use.

Are these settings correct ?

Thanks scottbreak for the great work, mate !



In other words, in your Hearthranger directory, you should have a folder named "CustomConfig". Inside you create a folder for example "Midrange_Hunter". Then you open "deck_config.ini" (it is in the same directory). Read the lines there! They are guide what to do. In short on the bottom of this file there is a an entry " [CONFIGS] ". There on the left side you type the name of the deck inside Hearthstone - example - "Midrange Hunter v1" (or whatever your deck name is) then "=" and you type the name of the directory -> "Midrange_Hunter". Simply you guide the bot when he reads your ingame deck name to a specific folder with files for this deck. It is as simple as that. Hope this helps.
Cheers
Back to top
WWW
2 users thanked NightlyKnight for this useful post.
scottbreak on 4/20/2017(UTC), MarinoBog on 4/21/2017(UTC)
MarinoBog
#95 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 6:42:23 PM(UTC)
MarinoBog


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 92
Man

Thanks: 116 times
Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 8 post(s)
I'll be testing decks tommorow, what decks are crucila to test now in standard casual? I can't test paladin tho, cuz I don't have all cards to build him...
Back to top
WWW
Metalkeik
#97 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 6:46:30 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 3
is there something wrong with taunt warrior? he always discards quest on mulligan.

the 2nd option in mulligan.json says "hold Fier Plume's Heart (UNG_934) when opponent is druid or mage or paladin or priest or shaman or warrior"

but 2 times it discarded when played against warrior.

same thing happened with Stonhill defender, the .json says "hold Stonehill Defender (UNG_072) when opponent is druid or hunter or mage or paladin or priest or shaman or warrior"

still didnt hold against hunter.

am i doing something wrong? :/
Back to top
WWW
scottbreak
#96 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 6:48:37 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
MarinoBog;48314 wrote:
I'll be testing decks tommorow, what decks are crucila to test now in standard casual? I can't test paladin tho, cuz I don't have all cards to build him...

It's only a small sample size, but Midrange Paladin has a 100% win rate after 10 games.
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
MarinoBog on 4/21/2017(UTC)
scottbreak
#98 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 6:51:35 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
Metalkeik;48315 wrote:
is there something wrong with taunt warrior? he always discards quest on mulligan.

the 2nd option in mulligan.json says "hold Fier Plume's Heart (UNG_934) when opponent is druid or mage or paladin or priest or shaman or warrior"

but 2 times it discarded when played against warrior.

same thing happened with Stonhill defender, the .json says "hold Stonehill Defender (UNG_072) when opponent is druid or hunter or mage or paladin or priest or shaman or warrior"

still didnt hold against hunter.

am i doing something wrong? :/

I didn't notice any issues. Right now I am trying to run Midrange and Murloc Paladin for 30+ games each. I will be running all of the decks on random starting tomorrow, and will get back to you.
Back to top
WWW
Metalkeik
#99 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 6:57:28 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 3
scottbreak;48318 wrote:
I didn't notice any issues. Right now I am trying to run Midrange and Murloc Paladin for 30+ games each. I will be running all of the decks on random starting tomorrow, and will get back to you.


thank you for your fast response.

ill give the deck a few more matches cause as i said it was only 3 matches it happened. i dont want to jump to conclusions :P

just threw it out here in case there is indeed a problem and someone might be interested to look at it.
Back to top
WWW
FMR Fear
#100 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 7:03:00 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 8

Thanks: 2 times
Am i the only one missing CustomConfig directory in HearthRanger and all of its containing files such as deck_config.ini etc.? :(
Back to top
WWW
NightlyKnight
#101 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 7:16:33 PM(UTC)
NightlyKnight


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 44
Man
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

Thanks: 19 times
Was thanked: 53 time(s) in 13 post(s)
FMR Fear;48320 wrote:
Am i the only one missing CustomConfig directory in HearthRanger and all of its containing files such as deck_config.ini etc.? :(


Open launcher and press "Need to re-download files ?" ;) it should put everything where it is supposed to be.
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked NightlyKnight for this useful post.
FMR Fear on 4/20/2017(UTC)
scottbreak
#102 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:04:58 PM(UTC)
scottbreak


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, HSModerator
Posts: 429

Thanks: 291 times
Was thanked: 469 time(s) in 153 post(s)
Midrange Paladin seems to be the winner so far
Back to top
WWW
1 user thanked scottbreak for this useful post.
NightlyKnight on 4/21/2017(UTC)
totalism
#105 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:14:48 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 10

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
I got a problem with a Druid Aggro because it didn't use a Living Mana and I see at log it mentioned about

PM:ERROR::ad1f13c9-8723-4202-bb29-4a81dbe290e5 - The input is not a valid Base-64 string as it contains a non-base 64 character, more than two padding characters, or an illegal character among the padding characters.

I don't know how to fix it if you can please help.

Thanks for a good deck scottbreak
Back to top
WWW
dohh
#103 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:29:30 PM(UTC)
dohh


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 54
Location: brasil

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 10 time(s) in 8 post(s)
scottbreak;48328 wrote:
Midrange Paladin seems to be the winner so far


what do u think of revive secret nzoth paladin that dominates before?
Back to top
WWW
68 Pages«<34567>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.299 seconds.