Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages<12
[Standard] Divine Aggro Paladin 60% WR
alabatusa
#22 Posted : Friday, May 13, 2016 5:57:07 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 42

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 10 post(s)
saikotik94;37955 wrote:
Hey, guys. I haven't contributed any to these forums, but after our recent troubles with the introduction to WotoG, I had to give props to Sixenm for his Divine Aggro Paladin Deck, to Sepefeets for his updated version of Silverfish and of course to alabatusa for creating the deck rules.

Before I post my results, I want to address that I have been using the same exact deck list posted on Hearthpwn. I have not substituted any cards, used any additional programs, or any other deck rules than what has been previously mentioned above. Concerning the Task Editor, I have been running Hearthranger on Auto concede at Rank 20 and 1 star.

Here are my results. As you can see, after 80 games and 547 minutes I have had significantly more wins than losses across all classes with my lowest win/loss against Druids and Warlocks at 71.4%, which really isn't that bad in my opinion. Since I have so many wins against those two classes, I have not considered adding an additional auto concede option against them.

While I tried to make this post sound as unbiased and as far from subjective as possible, I really want to highlight how much this deck and all of its contributors have turned this into possibly one of the best farming decks out there right now. This has become my standard go-to for farming my 100 gold per day and completing Paladin quests. Nearing 200 Ranked wins now, I have estimated only another day or two of farming Rank 20 before I have my Golden Paladin. Needless to say, I'm very pleased with the results.

There is one more thing that I would like to address. The Hearthstone meta, as we all know, is constantly fluctuating even outside of huge expansions like WotoG. Just because this deck and the deck rules and silverfish all happen to be working now to produce the results that I have posted, doesn't mean that it won't tank to a <50% win rate in the next month or so. Take advantage of the free wins/gold now while it lasts.

Lastly, if my post helps any of you out there, please be sure to give credit where credit is due and Thank the members who have helped contribute to the huge success this deck has brought to the HearthRanger community.


Thanks psychotic94?
Good to see your getting much better results than i was. Can you clarify if you got them in ranked or casual? Assuming its ranked, since you said 200 wins. It got me my gold paly in 3 days.
I wonder if you got better results due to using silverfish.
Im using a zoo now, while slower is still getting 65% win rate using zoo deck rules.
saikotik94
#23 Posted : Friday, May 13, 2016 6:39:31 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4
Location: N/A

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
alabatusa;37968 wrote:
Thanks psychotic94?
Good to see your getting much better results than i was. Can you clarify if you got them in ranked or casual? Assuming its ranked, since you said 200 wins. It got me my gold paly in 3 days.
I wonder if you got better results due to using silverfish.
Im using a zoo now, while slower is still getting 65% win rate using zoo deck rules.


Hey, alabatusa. To answer your first question, if I can direct your attention to the second paragraph of my first post, I stated that I have been running the bot on the Auto Concede option at Rank 20 and 1 star, so yes I am indeed playing in Ranked mode.

I also believe the updated version of Silverfish has greatly influenced the win/loss ratio. Since the update, I have seen much fewer errors. Mind you, I have only tested the Divine Aggro Paladin deck previously mentioned, so I can only attest to that one deck's performance in this current meta.

Update: Here are my current results. For a side by side comparison, here were my previous results.

As you can see, my overall statistics have remained consistent keeping the same cards, deck rules, and version of Silverfish. After botting for an additional ~13 hours, there has been a slight decrease in wins. This is true across all classes with the greatest difference in games against the Rogue at -11.8% (I went from 100.0% win/loss to 88.2%). This may be due to the new Miracle Rogue that has sprung up in the current meta, but I do not have enough data to confirm this. Still, dropping to 88.2% wins is not enough to convince me that I should add an Auto Concede option to blacklist Rogues. My reasoning for this is that there are simply not enough games played against Rogues to determine if this drop in wins is due to a trend or just chance.

One other interesting thing to note is that I have actually increased in wins against Mages (+2.4%), Shamans (+7.2%), and Warlocks (+8.6%). All of these classes have one thing in common, which is a significant increase in games played. I went from 12 games against Mages to 35 games. Shamans went from 9 games to 20 games. Warlocks went from 7 games to 15 games. In all of these match ups, the amount of games have increased by more than 100%. To reiterate, I have not changed any cards, deck rules, or A.I's, so I can determine that the only reason for my increase in wins is due to the amount of games played. This implies that the current results that I have are far more reliable than what I have previously posted.

I hope that this update helps any members out there who have considered running this deck. I am proud to have contributed my input, and I am eager to see HearthRanger and its users benefit from this data.
alabatusa
#24 Posted : Friday, May 13, 2016 11:36:52 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 42

Thanks: 11 times
Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Thats awesome Saik.

Wonder how'd you go if you let it rank freely, wonder how high you'd get.
saikotik94
#25 Posted : Saturday, May 14, 2016 12:50:37 AM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 4
Location: N/A

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
It's difficult to tell how high this deck would rank without the Auto Concede option. For now, I am pleased with the results and will continue to run with the current settings until I have unlocked the Golden Paladin. I have not been running the bot as much lately, so the Golden Paladin will be delayed by another day or so. However, after I have unlocked it I will attempt to run the bot with the same cards, deck rules, and version of Silverfish to see how high it can climb the ladder. If it yields good results, I will go ahead and post them here.
JimJonesBlunt
#26 Posted : Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:58:27 PM(UTC)
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Posts: 2

@saikotik94 what deck rules, mulligan, combo and silverfish settings do you use? or do you play with standard AI?
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.072 seconds.