SORRY GUYS & GALS
I had a typo in aggro druid that caused the bot to discard innervate. I have fixed it and just uploaded it. Sorry again :(

THanks blackoak. Will try it and will keep you guys updated.

First , I want to thank the efforts of all involved in the project . I started using the bot a few days and I'm impressed with the result.

I came to bring some thoughts on how the bot uses the aggrodruid . I used the deck manually to get rank 4 , then went back up to rank 15 to see how the bot would use the deck. But I must inform the bot uses the deck completely the wrong way , which surprised me , because it is much simpler than other decks that I have used successfully.

The mode " rush" of settings does not work. It makes countless unnecessary exchanges , particularly in a deck that should attack the face 98 % of the time. I switched to the mode " face" , but the deck makes bad decisions using Living Root to give two damage in the first round instead of invoking two creatures . And in both modes , a major problem is how the bot used the innervate , getting several times with 1 mana unused and invoking something insignificant , leading to many instances where the bot had waited one more turn to use innervate he could have made a simple but high-impact move.

If the bot use this deck in the correct way , I believe this is the best candidate in the current mategame for rank legend with the bot. I will continue to bring my analysis , and I apologize for writing problems , English is not my native language .

ps: the deck also uses the wrong way Shad of Naxx , not attacking

Well I gotta say, I am very happy with this bot and this thread. I was a bit wary of spending all my dust on mysterious challengers, but it worked out. I used emilcoff's midrange secredin with the SVN and mulligan/combo and got from rank 13 to rank 5. There were some very nice win streaks along the way, but it ended up with a solid 55.6% win rate. The deck seemed to struggle with aggro, but did generally well versus most other matchups.

Here are my stats, http://imgur.com/nbY9yf0
I'm not going to post proof because I'm paranoid as hell.

One last thanks to you guys for some fantastic work :D

I spent all afternoon testing the face hunter , and most of the time the bot has played correctly.

I saw only three major problems , the first is the misuse of the Knife Jugler , where he sometimes invokes Jugler after attack with the spider or after invoking another creature . The second is the insistence of the bot to use the weapon to attack creatures that are not threats , including eggs , even the opponent being almost dead . Sometimes the bot also makes unnecessary exchanges , it should focus more on the face, making exchanges only in extreme cases . The last problem is the bad use of silence , I saw the bot using the owl to silence haunted creepers more than once , he should keep the silence for use in taunts. I am posting the logs on another topic.

Starting from rank 15 I got about 55 % win in 40 matches , getting stagnant at rank 13 .

Really interested in getting this deck worked out as I've seen it prior to your post. Looks like a promising deck. Alas, I am a newb to this bot & silverfish and don't know where any of the files from OP goes to. Searched the forums but I'm honestly stumped. Sorry for the stupid question but is there a simplified tutorial or video showcasing how mulligan settings are put in?

i dont know why my paladin never uses his weapon from muster for batlle to atk the enemy

no, they obviously are separate documents;), hence the ".txt" at the ending of each. You asked specifically for what to do with "mulligan.txt", not all of them.

I'm not like judging you or something, just trying to be specific. You do the same thing with all three documents. Create into silverfish folder and copypaste the text/code into them

From here on you should be able to figure it out. I'm a bit wary of clogging up this important thread you know


Anyone else in the same situation who is reading this, don't post in the project legend thread but find the right subforum and thread there

Again, not judging, noone has to say "my bad" or shit like that

@BlackOak
There seems to be confusion to some extent about the docs actually having to be made, instead of modifying already existing ones
Maybe write a line in the OP saying this
I, too, needed awhile to wrap my head around having to create a document for a bot that I know f*ckall about

Yeah sorry I made the assumption that people read other threads I'll try and write a bit more information ( never been good at the written word :P )