Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Poor Mans Warlock Zoo deck.
PaladinRanger
#1 Posted : Friday, September 16, 2016 5:59:47 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 10

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
This is a poor mans version of a succesful competition deck that I bashed together with what I had right now. I've always wanted to play a zoo deck, but until the welcome pack I was missing a couple of important cards.

Flame Imp is king here. Knife Juggler is a great early board killer, Abusive Sergeant is strong in this deck too. Speed is the name of the game here (I'm using Blackoak files for Warlockzoo Aggro). So far I've managed a 55% win ratio, (basically warrior kills this deck, but it's strong against most of the others or bad players/starts)

Forbidden Ritual,1
Abusive Sergeant,1
Argent Squire,1
Corruption,1
Flame Imp,1
Leper Gnome,1
Possessed Villager,1
Voidwalker,2
Acidic Swamp Ooze,1
Curse of Rafaam,1
Dark Peddler,2
Darkshire Librarian,1
Demonfire,1
Dire Wolf Alpha,2
Knife Juggler,1
Darkshire Councilman,2
Drain Life,1
Sense Demons,1
Shadow Bolt,1
Silverware Golem,2
Defender of Argus,1
Shadowflame,1
Summoning Portal,1
Doomguard,1
Dread Infernal,1
Kraker01
#2 Posted : Friday, September 16, 2016 5:59:20 PM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 102

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 10 post(s)
Ranked or casual?
PaladinRanger
#3 Posted : Saturday, September 17, 2016 5:51:52 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 10

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Kraker01;41329 wrote:
Ranked or casual?


Casual. This deck isn't ready for ranked games yet.

It's primarily targetted at Gold Farmers looking to increase their card collection towards a r5 collection.

I'm tweaking the rules for playing this deck, but can't get it's above 42.67% (from 32 games) for ranked play, so no good for that.
Kraker01
#4 Posted : Sunday, September 18, 2016 7:10:35 AM(UTC)

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 102

Thanks: 10 times
Was thanked: 13 time(s) in 10 post(s)
I'm wondering...

I'm using a simple Paladin base deck (got from Icy Veins site) and I'm getting 95% wins using CONCEDE IF LAST WON (obviously in casual mode)

Why bothering with different decks? I'm just asking, is three something I don't know?
PaladinRanger
#5 Posted : Sunday, September 18, 2016 3:25:16 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Groups: Registered
Posts: 10

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
Kraker01;41399 wrote:
I'm wondering...

I'm using a simple Paladin base deck (got from Icy Veins site) and I'm getting 95% wins using CONCEDE IF LAST WON (obviously in casual mode)

Why bothering with different decks? I'm just asking, is three something I don't know?


Good point. I must admit I hadn't implemented the CONCEDE IF LAST WON option, as I thought it might be obvious botting activity. If this method is safe then it's better than mine!

I guess I was trying to build a halfway deck to use during ranked play that might be a stepping stone to one of the Rank5 decks festured on this site. But I concede it might not be that useful.

Your input has made me research techniques more, so I'm thankful for your points!
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2011, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.043 seconds.